PsycTESTS Dataset 1984
DOI: 10.1037/t63583-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Negotiation Strategy Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviews were audiotaped, and transcripts of the interviews were scored by a separate rater, blind to all other information. In a previous reliability study of the INS interview measure, direct agreement for each of the 32 level scores averaged 81% on a sample of 25 subjects (Krupa, 1984). On a sample of 25 subjects from this study, a Pearson product-moment correlation of .94 was obtained between the overall (averaged) INS scores coded by one of the coders from the original reliability study and the INS coder for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews were audiotaped, and transcripts of the interviews were scored by a separate rater, blind to all other information. In a previous reliability study of the INS interview measure, direct agreement for each of the 32 level scores averaged 81% on a sample of 25 subjects (Krupa, 1984). On a sample of 25 subjects from this study, a Pearson product-moment correlation of .94 was obtained between the overall (averaged) INS scores coded by one of the coders from the original reliability study and the INS coder for the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts of the interviews were scored by one of the authors, who was trained to the level of established reliability. Interrater reliability had been established in a previous study: Direct agreement on level for scoring each of the four issues, based on a sample of 25 subjects, ranged from 62% to 96%, with a mean of 81% (Krupa, 1984). The four component issues representing each of the function steps in the negotiation process—definition of problem, action taken, justification, and complexity of feelings—were coded separately for each dilemma, as detailed in the INS manual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%