Interpersonal Mindfulness: Scale Development and Initial Construct Validation

Pratscher, Steven D.; Wood, Phillip K.; King, Laura A.; Bettencourt, B. Ann

doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1057-2

Cited by 62 publications

(147 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

104

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…What differentiates intrapersonal mindfulness from interpersonal mindfulness are interpersonal interaction processes. Pratscher et al (2019) suggest that interpersonal mindfulness is a significant variable providing an explanation for relationships instead of mindfulness. Therefore, it might be concluded that interpersonal mindfulness affects interpersonal relationships to a certain extent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The benefits of the mindfulness have been proven with numerous research. For instance, research has found that mindfulness is related with self-regulation (Brown & Ryan, 2003;Bishop et al, 2004;Rupprecht, Paulus, & Walach, 2017); emotion regulation (Bao, Xue, & Kong, 2015;Cenkseven Onder & Utkan, 2018;Uygur, 2017); empathy (Pepping & Halford, 2016;Pratscher et al, 2019); stress (Bao et al, 2015;Cenkseven Onder & Utkan, 2018;Chu, 2010;Kabat-Zinn, 2005;Neece, 2014), and anxiety (Goodman et al, 2014;Guardino, Dunkel Schetter, Bower, Lu, & Smalley, 2014;Vieten & Astin, 2008). It can be seen that most of the studies in the literature, which focus on the subject, examine mindfulness as experienced through individuals' inner experiences (Frank, Jennings, & Greenberg, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…al., 2016;McCaffrey, Reitman, & Black, 2017;Pratscher et. al., 2018;Pratscher et al, 2019). Studies have found positive relationships between data collection tools measuring interpersonal mindfulness and those measuring traditional explanations of mindfulness (Duncan, 2007;Erus, 2019;McCaffrey et al, 2017;Parent, McKee, Rough, & Forehand, 2016;Pratscher et al, 2018;Pratscher et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, there are studies that have found relationships between different variables, mindfulness and interpersonal mindfulness. Therefore, it could be claimed that these two concepts involve different constructs (Duncan, 2007;Erus, 2019;Pratscher et al, 2019). Researchers studying interpersonal mindfulness define traditional explanations of mindfulness as intrapersonal mindfulness (Duncan, Coatsworth, & Greenberg, 2009;Kohlenberg et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Examining the effects of mindfulness on interpersonal relationships has been topical in the current literature. There have been recent studies focusing on interpersonal mindfulness (de Bruin et al, 2014;Duncan et al, 2009;Erus, 2019;Lippold, Duncan, Coatsworth, Nix, & Greenberg, 2015;McCaffrey et al, 2017;Parent et al, 2016;Pratscher et al, 2018;Pratscher et al, 2019). Interpersonal mindfulness raises individuals' awareness by being non-judgmental about the present moment while interacting with other people (Stahl & Goldstein, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Development of Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-TR (IMS-TR): Validity and Reliability

Erus¹,

Tekel²

2020

EUROPEAN J ED RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to develop an Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-TR (IMS-TR) for Turkish culture. For the data collection process, four different sample groups participated in the study. To test the construct validity of the scale an exploratory factor analysis was performed. Results suggested a 13-item, two-factor solution as (1) awareness and (2) being in the moment. Twofactor structure explains 50.65% of the variance. A confirmatory factor analysis results showed good fit for two-factor solution. The Mindfulness in Parenting Questionnaire and the Mindfulness in Marriage Scale were used to examine a convergent validity and positive significant relationships were found between the scales. To test the reliability of the scale Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of the overall scale was determined to be .826. To determine the stability coefficient of the IMS-TR, test-retest method was used and according to result there is a positive relationship between the scales. According to all of these results, it can be said that the IMS-TR has a validity and reliability.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Development of Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-TR (IMS-TR): Validity and Reliability

Erus¹,

Tekel²

2020

EUROPEAN J ED RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Interpersonal mindfulness and forgiveness: Examining the mediating roles of anger rumination and state anger

Yang

Chen

2022

Aggressive Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measuring mindfulness without accounting for specific contexts may lead to controversial results. This study attempted to examine whether the newly proposed construct of interpersonal mindfulness, mindfulness as it happens within the interpersonal context, was connected to forgiveness and the mechanisms behind this connection. Data were collected from 312 participants using measures of interpersonal mindfulness, trait mindfulness, anger rumination, state anger, self‐reported forgiveness, and forgiving behavior. Results showed that interpersonal mindfulness was significantly associated with both self‐reported forgiveness and forgiving behavior even while accounting for trait mindfulness. Mediation analysis revealed that anger rumination and state anger could mediate this link separately and sequentially, but only when trait mindfulness was uncontrolled. When controlling for trait mindfulness, the mediating role of state anger remained significant, but neither anger rumination nor the serial combination did. An alternative model was also supported, showing that after controlling for interpersonal mindfulness, trait mindfulness was indirectly associated with forgiveness through anger rumination and the serial mediating effect of anger rumination and state anger, but not state anger. These findings suggest that interpersonal mindfulness is more suitable for predicting interpersonal forgiveness than trait mindfulness. State anger may operate as a proximal mechanism in explaining how mindfulness relates to interpersonal forgiveness, whereas anger rumination may operate at a more distal level.

show abstract

Mindfulness meditation is associated with decreases in partner negative affect in daily life

May

Ostafin

Snippe

2019

Euro J Social Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Interpersonal Mindfulness: Scale Development and Initial Construct Validation

Cited by 62 publications

References 64 publications

Development of Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-TR (IMS-TR): Validity and Reliability

Development of Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-TR (IMS-TR): Validity and Reliability

Interpersonal mindfulness and forgiveness: Examining the mediating roles of anger rumination and state anger

Mindfulness meditation is associated with decreases in partner negative affect in daily life

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About