2011
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal contribution to outcome: the relation of interpersonal distress and symptomatic improvement as a result of psychotherapy

Abstract: The study utilized a 32-item brief measure of interpersonal problems (IIP) to examine interpersonal distress in relation to symptomology and treatment outcome as assessed by the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45). The study included a community sample of 210 individuals receiving psychotherapy at a mental health training facility. A number of significant correlations were found between interpersonal distresses with symptomology. The highest correlations were found between levels of general interpersonal distress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, studies where samples were divided into subgroups according to interpersonal style tend to show that submissive and, to a lesser degree, cold patients tend to have a worse prognosis. This is in contrast to mixed findings when analysing correlations between axis scores and outcomes in whole samples (e.g., Borkovec, Newman, Pincus, & Lytle, ; Hardy, Tracey, Glidden‐Tracey, Hess, & Rohlfing, ). Most frequently, cluster analyses have yielded groupings that were pretty evenly spaced around the circumplex and could readily be interpreted with reference to the two axes.…”
Section: The Interpersonal Circumplex and The Inventory Of Interpersocontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Taken together, studies where samples were divided into subgroups according to interpersonal style tend to show that submissive and, to a lesser degree, cold patients tend to have a worse prognosis. This is in contrast to mixed findings when analysing correlations between axis scores and outcomes in whole samples (e.g., Borkovec, Newman, Pincus, & Lytle, ; Hardy, Tracey, Glidden‐Tracey, Hess, & Rohlfing, ). Most frequently, cluster analyses have yielded groupings that were pretty evenly spaced around the circumplex and could readily be interpreted with reference to the two axes.…”
Section: The Interpersonal Circumplex and The Inventory Of Interpersocontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The measure is based on a theoretical circumplex structure of interpersonal behavior and has received considerable research support on its structural validity [ 39 ]-[ 41 ]. It yields global interpersonal distress, two dimensional scores of dominance distress and affiliation distress, and octant scores which indicate eight dimensions of interpersonal problems constituting a circumplex of personality: domineering/controlling (PA), vindictive/self-centered (BC), cold/distant(DE), socially inhibited (FG), nonassertive (HI), overly accommodating (JK), self-sacrificing (LM), and intrusive/needy (NO) [ 42 ]. Figure 1 describes the circumplex structure of Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%