2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02680.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Communication: Theoretical Perspectives, Future Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(135 reference statements)
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the domain of the context, other attributes of the context and interaction should be theorized, particularly leveraging interpersonal communication theories (Berger, 2005). This research employed one-time interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the domain of the context, other attributes of the context and interaction should be theorized, particularly leveraging interpersonal communication theories (Berger, 2005). This research employed one-time interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, we argue that appropriate and effective communication (communication performance) is dependent on the emotional skills used by an individual, and this performance emerges in a succession of exchanges. Other skills that involve the elements of detecting, understanding, and regulating emotional displays, such as encoding and decoding skills (Berger, 2005), nonverbal communication skills (Burgoon & Bacue, 2003), and persuading skills (Dillard & Marshall, 2003), have been found to directly contribute to successful communication performance. Similar to Berger (2005), we assert that emotional skills contribute to better communication outcomes for individuals within teams.…”
Section: Alternative Approaches To Team Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a pair of close friends is an instance of a relational type factor, and a demand is a kind of a tactic factor. Factors correspond to both objective elements and mental representations of social reality: Objectively, many interactions share the same classes of factors (e.g., contexts, tactics), but specific instances (e.g., doctor visit, request) vary across conversations; mentally, however, people hold the basic classes of factors and can even have similar representations of a specific instance, especially if they are from similar speech communities (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2000;Berger, 2005Berger, , 2007Coulmas, 1981). Factors are similar to features (Greene, 1997;Meyer, 1997;Wilson, 1990), cues (Berger & Kellermann, 1994), concepts (Schank & Abelson, 1977), and dimensions (Cody, Canary, & Smith, 1994).…”
Section: The Detection Of Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%