2004
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/3/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interparticle gap distributions on one-dimensional lattices

Abstract: We analyse the successive binding of two species of particles on a onedimensional discrete lattice, where the second variety is deposited only after complete adsorption of the first. We consider the two extreme cases of a perfectly irreversible initial deposition, with non-sliding particles, and that of a fully equilibrated one. For the latter we construct the exact gap distribution from the Tonks gas partition function. This distribution is contrasted with that obtained from the random sequential adsorption p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ming state, the distribution functions of the minimum distances f (δ) were non-zeros in the interval 0 ≤ δ < 1 and were almost identical for different values of ε. Note that for disks (ε = 1) the obtained function f (δ) was similar to that observed earlier for the distribution function of the gaps between line segments [20,28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ming state, the distribution functions of the minimum distances f (δ) were non-zeros in the interval 0 ≤ δ < 1 and were almost identical for different values of ε. Note that for disks (ε = 1) the obtained function f (δ) was similar to that observed earlier for the distribution function of the gaps between line segments [20,28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By contrast, a diffusionally equilibrated system corresponds to a 1D Tonks gas [19]. The gap distribution functions of totally irreversible and fully equilibrated 1D depositions of line segments demonstrate the presence of strong differences between these two systems [20]. In a modified adsorption-desorption RSA model, the particles can be adsorbed with a rate of k + , or desorbed with a rate of k − .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, BER enzymes are not point particles but have a finite size of about 10-15 base pairs. Random adsorption of finite sized particles has been studied 37 and could be used to enhance our current model. We also neglected the sliding of BER enzymes on DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were surprising since they differed substantially from the spacing distribution predicted by the random car parking model. The gap distribution for various versions of the random sequential adsorption model has been studied in detail in [8,9] since it has direct consequences among others for the distribution of cracks in brittle materials [10]. In the most simple continuous case (random car parking model) the spacing distribution P (D) behaves like [11].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%