Abstract:There are multiple methods for treating patients with IOM injuries. Physicians should be highly suspicious about this injury when a patient presents with a highly displaced radial head fracture associated with wrist pain. Treatment with reconstruction of the cerebral band of the IOM with radial head replacement (do not overstuff) and temporary uploading the construct with K-wires from the ulna to the radius will give the most predictable results.
“…Transverse and longitudinal stability is necessary for the human forearm, which is viewed as a dynamic structural entirety. [6] To accomplish accurate and remarkable tasks, the forearm bones must act as a single functional unit in consort with the interosseous membranes and ipsilateral radioulnar joints. Anatomical restoration and stable fixation are mandatory in the treatment of any forearm fracture, which should be treated in an equivalent manner as an intraarticular fracture.…”
Rationale:
The old Monteggia fracture is an uncommon lesion pattern in adult, which may lead to the potential complications such as recurrent dislocation of the radial head, heterotopic ossification of the elbow, nerve palsy, malunion of the ulna, and residual forearm deformity. However, the secondary distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation is rarely reported in the similar lesion. Here we present a unique reoperation of old Monteggia fracture combined with secondary DRUJ disruption after the initial operation failure.
Patient concerns:
A 38-year-old male presented to our hospital outpatient office complaining of left elbow stiffness and ongoing wrist dysfunction with a history of injury to the left forearm caused by a forklift accident that occurred 5 months previously.
Diagnosis and interventions:
At the local hospital, the patient underwent successively fasciotomy and decompression, ulnar open reduction, and internal fixation due to osteofascial compartment syndrome and a misdiagnosed ulnar fracture. Upon examination, the secondary dorsal dislocation of the DRUJ was obvious both clinically and radiographically. We performed a revision surgery called ulnar osteotomy, radioulnar ligament repair, and temporary fixation of the DRUJ with a Kirschner wire.
Outcomes:
The patient received a satisfactory result without observed redislocation and relapse according to the 1-year follow-up.
Lessons:
Considering the notoriously poor outcomes, the importance of early recognition and accurate treatment should be emphasized repeatedly in similar lesions. Paying close and continuous attention to the clinical and radiographic examinations of the elbow and wrist joint is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
“…Transverse and longitudinal stability is necessary for the human forearm, which is viewed as a dynamic structural entirety. [6] To accomplish accurate and remarkable tasks, the forearm bones must act as a single functional unit in consort with the interosseous membranes and ipsilateral radioulnar joints. Anatomical restoration and stable fixation are mandatory in the treatment of any forearm fracture, which should be treated in an equivalent manner as an intraarticular fracture.…”
Rationale:
The old Monteggia fracture is an uncommon lesion pattern in adult, which may lead to the potential complications such as recurrent dislocation of the radial head, heterotopic ossification of the elbow, nerve palsy, malunion of the ulna, and residual forearm deformity. However, the secondary distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation is rarely reported in the similar lesion. Here we present a unique reoperation of old Monteggia fracture combined with secondary DRUJ disruption after the initial operation failure.
Patient concerns:
A 38-year-old male presented to our hospital outpatient office complaining of left elbow stiffness and ongoing wrist dysfunction with a history of injury to the left forearm caused by a forklift accident that occurred 5 months previously.
Diagnosis and interventions:
At the local hospital, the patient underwent successively fasciotomy and decompression, ulnar open reduction, and internal fixation due to osteofascial compartment syndrome and a misdiagnosed ulnar fracture. Upon examination, the secondary dorsal dislocation of the DRUJ was obvious both clinically and radiographically. We performed a revision surgery called ulnar osteotomy, radioulnar ligament repair, and temporary fixation of the DRUJ with a Kirschner wire.
Outcomes:
The patient received a satisfactory result without observed redislocation and relapse according to the 1-year follow-up.
Lessons:
Considering the notoriously poor outcomes, the importance of early recognition and accurate treatment should be emphasized repeatedly in similar lesions. Paying close and continuous attention to the clinical and radiographic examinations of the elbow and wrist joint is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
“…Studies have shown that the interosseous membrane contributes to the stability of the forearm. Interosseous membrane rupture may cause humeroradial joint and ulnocarpal joint impaction, elbow and wrist pain, and limited forearm movement [21][22][23] . Gutowski et al 24 reported that the values for supination and pronation increased by 26% and 22%, respectively, after cutting the interosseous membrane of the forearm.…”
Section: Repairing the Coronacloid Fracturementioning
Objective:In order to reduce surgical scars and the risk of neurovascular injury for the treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow (TTI), minimally invasive and better therapeutic effect approaches are being explored to replace the conventional combined lateral and medial approach (CLMA). This study was performed to compare the clinical effect and security of the modified posterior approach (MPA) through the space of the proximal radioulnar joint vs the CLMA for treatment of TTI.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 76 patients treated for TTI from January 2009 to December 2020 (MPA: n = 44; CLMA: n = 32). Treatment involved plate and screw fixation or Steinmann pin fixation for the radial head and ulnar coronoid process fractures. Surgeons only sutured the lateral ligament because the medial collateral ligament was usually integrated in the TTI. The continuous variables were compared by the independent Student t-test and the categorical variables by the χ 2 -test or Fisher's exact test.Results: Both groups of patients attained a satisfactory MEPS after the operation. The MEPS (MPA: 96.82 AE 6.04 vs CLMA: 96.56 AE 5.51) was not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the MPA resulted in better elbow flexion and extension (
“…It can occur at 3 different locations: (1) within the supinator muscle, close to the radial tuberosity, in the case of insufficient intraoperative washing; (2) at the opposite side of the radial tuberosity, in the case of extensive drilling, resulting in cortical effraction; and (3) close to the proximal radioulnar joint, in the case of a proximal interosseous membrane lesion. In the third location, proximal radioulnar synostosis may also develop . Ultrasonography shows heterotopic ossification earlier than does radiography, showing hyperechoic nodules or streaks with posterior acoustic attenuation within muscles .…”
Section: Imaging Appearance Of Surgical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third location, proximal radioulnar synostosis may also develop. 9,38 Ultrasonography shows heterotopic ossification earlier than does radiography, showing hyperechoic nodules or streaks with posterior acoustic attenuation within muscles. 9,10,39 Indomethacin and radiotherapy have been used in an effort to prevent heterotopic ossification.…”
Section: Imaging Appearance Of Surgical Complicationsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.