Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology

Abstract

We argue in this paper that when the knowledge base of an industry is both complex and expanding and the sources of expertise are widely dispersed, the locus of innovation will be found in networks of learning, rather than in individual firms. The large-scale reliance on interorganizational collaborations in the biotechnology industry reflects a fundamental and pervasive concern with access to knowledge. We develop a network approach to organizational learning and derive firm-level, longitudinal hypotheses that link research and development alliances, experience with managing interfirm relationships, network position, rates of growth, and portfolios of collaborative activities. We test these hypotheses on a sample of dedicated biotechnology firms in the years 1990-1994. Results from pooled, within-firm, time series analyses support a learning view and have broad implications for future theoretical and empirical research on organizational networks and strategic alliances.*

Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material

“…Consortium members are more likely to remain in a research and development (R&D) consortium when they have additional ties to other organizations in the consortium (Olk and Young 1997). Furthermore, more centrally positioned organizations will acquire more new linkages (Tsai 2000;Powell et al 1996Powell et al , 2005, and network structures tend to persist (Walker et al 1997, Lorenzoni andLipparini 1999). These tendencies to replicate and strengthen existing relationships and network structures highlight path-dependent consequences of embeddedness, thereby exemplifying evolutionary dynamics (Gulati 1998, Uzzi 1997.…”

Management dilemmas in innovative supplier networks

“…The reasoning behind this is that as the essence of innovation is to produce solutions that combine previously unrelated elements in a novel way, interaction within the supply network is the key to attain tacit and context specific knowledge elemental to the innovation (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995). This approach is recognised in the use of such concepts as networks of learning (Powell et al, 1996), collaboration networks (Ahuja, 2000), open innovation (Chesbrough, 2003;, and innovation networks (Dhanaraj and Parkhe, 2006).…”

As Redes Intraorganizacionais são Inclusivas? Utopia e Testes

“…Em comparação com a Ordem do Mercado, as informações não ganham a transparência e rápida difusão encontrada no sistema de preços. Em contraste, as informações mais ricas e sensíveis passam através dos vínculos de confiança (POWELL et al, 1996). Em comparação com a Ordem Cívica, as informações são opacas (e não públicas); de forma relacionada, é possível que interesses locais sejam atendidos, sem ferir os requisitos da aprovação pública.…”