2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17258-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interoperable Metadata Bridges to the wider Language Technology Ecosystem

Abstract: One of the objectives of the European Language Grid is to help overcome the fragmentation of the European Language Technology community by bringing together language resources and technologies, information about them, Language Technology consumers, providers and the wider public. This chapter describes the mechanisms ELG has put in place to build interoperable bridges to related initiatives, infrastructures, platforms and repositories in the wider Language Technology landscape. We focus on the different approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of structural metadata in an easily accessible way that allows searching high variety datasets is arguably the greatest challenge to turning existing data into new actionable information (Rasmussen, 2018). Metadata schemas tend to be focused on specific domains (Canham and Ohmann, 2016), stop at a very high conceptual level (Shukair et al, 2013) or focus on descriptive metadata with a fixed structure (Devare, 2017;Labropoulou et al, 2020). Specific metadata schemas exist for specific datasets.…”
Section: Design Principles Metadata Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of structural metadata in an easily accessible way that allows searching high variety datasets is arguably the greatest challenge to turning existing data into new actionable information (Rasmussen, 2018). Metadata schemas tend to be focused on specific domains (Canham and Ohmann, 2016), stop at a very high conceptual level (Shukair et al, 2013) or focus on descriptive metadata with a fixed structure (Devare, 2017;Labropoulou et al, 2020). Specific metadata schemas exist for specific datasets.…”
Section: Design Principles Metadata Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%