2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2011
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2011.6039416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interoperable device identification in Smart-Grid environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally it is left to say that our approach differs from Majdalawieh et al (2007), Cheung et al (2008), Kuntze et al (2011), Honeywell International (2012, Rosic et al (2013), and Veichtlbauer et al (2013) in several aspects. Firstly, the majority of existing approaches (Cheung et al, 2008;Honeywell International, 2012;Rosic et al, 2013;Veichtlbauer et al, 2013) base their interoperability level on the decisions of each control centre without looking at, for example, the accessibility level of a determined demanding context/region as stated in Kapsalis et al (2006).…”
Section: Discussion and Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally it is left to say that our approach differs from Majdalawieh et al (2007), Cheung et al (2008), Kuntze et al (2011), Honeywell International (2012, Rosic et al (2013), and Veichtlbauer et al (2013) in several aspects. Firstly, the majority of existing approaches (Cheung et al, 2008;Honeywell International, 2012;Rosic et al, 2013;Veichtlbauer et al, 2013) base their interoperability level on the decisions of each control centre without looking at, for example, the accessibility level of a determined demanding context/region as stated in Kapsalis et al (2006).…”
Section: Discussion and Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…), type of organisational hierarchy, …) but discard the possibility of following specific security standards, which can help ensure a better interoperability and sustainability of the system. Likewise, the automation during the authorisation process is not always guaranteed where the policy decision points generally depend on each organisation (Cheung et al, 2008), instead of being shared by a group of organisations (e.g., SCADA 1 -SCADA 2 -Providers, Kuntze et al, 2011). This criterion is also sustained by Lang andSchreiner (2012) andNIST 7628 (2013).…”
Section: Discussion and Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could lead to a so called Trusted Grid, where different components in a Smart Grid evaluate each other, like it is already the case for the so called Trusted Core Network 2 developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology in Germany. In this context, the custom transport interface might also be used 2 https://www.sit.fraunhofer.de/en/tcn/ to apply the TNC based device identification approach for so called Smart Energy Gateways described by [22] in a German Smart Metering System. Additionally, the evaluation results generated with TNC can be incorporated into a monitoring system for the Smart Grid, to create an overview of the grid integrity for example.…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Kuntze, Rudolph, Bente, Vieweg, & Helden, 2011) show that a substantial number of vulnerabilities, both known and unknown to the client can alter the industrial software practices. Majority of threats that affect computing systems do so through servers and networks because users are not keen to update the patches due to time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%