2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interoperability-Related Architectural Problems and Solutions in Information Systems: A Scoping Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, interoperability has been an issue already experienced in healthcare (Brooks, 2020). As interoperability faces many challenges, e.g., different communication protocols, incompatible architectures, heterogeneous data models, and ambiguous meanings of information exchanged (Abukwaik, Taibi & Rombach, 2014), BPMN comprehension is usually not enough to deal with it. This finding shows that BPMN works as the opening of software understanding, the bridge between stakeholders and the software team, but each step in the process mapped has to be unraveled by requirements elicitation and development teams in order to find the most suitable technical solution for specific issues.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, interoperability has been an issue already experienced in healthcare (Brooks, 2020). As interoperability faces many challenges, e.g., different communication protocols, incompatible architectures, heterogeneous data models, and ambiguous meanings of information exchanged (Abukwaik, Taibi & Rombach, 2014), BPMN comprehension is usually not enough to deal with it. This finding shows that BPMN works as the opening of software understanding, the bridge between stakeholders and the software team, but each step in the process mapped has to be unraveled by requirements elicitation and development teams in order to find the most suitable technical solution for specific issues.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic integration is achieved when information assets have one meaning or one context (Prabhakaran and Chou, 2006). Abukwaik, Taibi and Rombach (2014) note that a multitude of architectural interoperability problems are at the technical, syntactical, semantic and pragmatic levels. This emanates from systems’ heterogeneity on data representation, meaning or context.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms used in the data (types of entities, their properties, datatypes, and identifiers) should be understood in a sufficiently similar manner by the systems to make their practical operations successful. The solutions for semantic interoperability are still in development with approaches based on standards, ontologies, wrappers, and mediators (Abukwaik, 2014). In the construction domain also classification systems can address some aspects of semantic interoperability.…”
Section: Semantic Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pragmatic interoperability: There are several issues related to processes, security, adaptation to dynamic changes, organizational arrangements, and even legal considerations where the systems may need to be in an agreement to successfully work together. Occasionally some of these aspects are regarded as additional layers of interoperability (EIF, 2017) (Abukwaik, 2014).…”
Section: Semantic Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%