Interoperability Knowledge Base for Persistent Identifiers Interoperability Framework

Bellini, Emanuele; Luddi, Cinzia; Cirinnà, Chiara; Lunghi, Maurizio; Felicetti, Achille; Bazzanella, Barbara; Bouquet, Paolo

doi:10.1109/sitis.2012.130

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The intuitive concept of adding trust to a dataset that will be exchanged among several parties emerged several years ago, with a problem of stability and discoverability of the Internet resources over time (http 404 error). The issue has been addressed by implementing persistent identifiers (e.g., CoolURI, Digital Object Identifier, National Bibliography Number) and digital preservation services [9,10] in order to guarantee the trustworthiness of the digital resources exploited. The introduction of blockchain technology intuitively opens new technical possibilities to build trust for digital datasets that have been only partially explored in the current publications [11,12].…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing IoT Data Dependability through a Blockchain Mirror Model

Bellini¹,

Bellini

Gherardelli

et al. 2019

Future Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a remarkable data producer and these data may be used to prevent or detect security vulnerabilities and increase productivity by the adoption of statistical and Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques. However, these desirable benefits are gained if data from IoT networks are dependable—this is where blockchain comes into play. In fact, through blockchain, critical IoT data may be trusted, i.e., considered valid for any subsequent processing. A simple formal model named “the Mirror Model” is proposed to connect IoT data organized in traditional models to assets of trust in a blockchain. The Mirror Model sets some formal conditions to produce trusted data that remain trusted over time. A possible practical implementation of an application programming interface (API) is proposed, which keeps the data and the trust model in synch. Finally, it is noted that the Mirror Model enforces a top-down approach from reality to implementation instead of going the opposite way as it is now the practice when referring to blockchain and the IoT.

show abstract

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing IoT Data Dependability through a Blockchain Mirror Model

Bellini¹,

Bellini

Gherardelli

et al. 2019

Future Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With the standard registry system, an object can be universally identified or located and support interoperability among different persistent identifiers. Several frameworks (Bellini et al , 2012; Kahn and Wilensky, 1995; Dunshire, 2007) have been proposed to achieve interoperability.…”

Section: Known Issues For Long-term Digital Preservationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital preservation: some underlying issues for long-term preservation

Tripathi

2018

LHTN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the concept of digital preservation and traditional preservation per se and discusses various issues related to long-term preservation in a digital environment. Design/methodology/approach The study attempts to look into the various aspects of preservation in context of digital objects (borne or digitalized) especially. Bundling of an object (digital), digital storage, quality control and risk preparedness are some of the pointers studied to perceive an overall scenario for long-term preservation of an object. Findings Various methods have been suggested to deal with the issues related to long-term preservation of an object which can be used to frame an organization’s policy for long-term preservation. Originality/value The study emphasizes on collective measures incorporating traditional and digital means to ensure long-term preservation. It lists down various checklists to deal with various issues pertinent to long-term digital preservation.

show abstract

“…One of the first works which considers persistent identifiers as a more complex concept than just a redirection mechanism is given by [3]. The basic approach is an ontological refinement of metadata sets contained in persistent identifier data records, which enables a common information set for the various persistent identifier systems.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The focus is the integration of common abstract datatypes into persistent identifier data records, which can be consumed by machine actors. In contrast to [3], their core emphasize is to provide a standardized set of information entities about the identified dataset itself.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

DNS as Resolution Infrastructure for Persistent Identifiers

Berber

Yahyapour

2017

Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The concept of persistent identification is increasingly important for research data management. At the beginnings it was only considered as a persistent naming mechanism for research datasets, which is achieved by providing an abstraction for addresses of research datasets. However, recent developments in research data management have led persistent identification to move towards a concept which realizes a virtual global research data network. The base for this is the ability of persistent identifiers of holding semantic information about the identified dataset itself. Hence, community-specific representations of research datasets are mapped into globally common data structures provided by persistent identifiers. This ultimately enables a standardized data exchange between diverse scientific fields.Therefore, for the immense amount of research datasets, a robust and performant global resolution system is essential. However, for persistent identifiers the number of resolution systems is in comparison to the count of DNS resolvers extremely small. For the Handle System for instance, which is the most established persistent identifier system, there are currently only five globally distributed resolvers available.The fundamental idea of this work is therefore to enable persistent identifier resolution over DNS traffic. On the one side, this leads to a faster resolution of persistent identifiers. On the other side, this approach transforms the DNS system to a data dissemination system.

show abstract

Interoperability Knowledge Base for Persistent Identifiers Interoperability Framework

Cited by 13 publications

References 7 publications

Enhancing IoT Data Dependability through a Blockchain Mirror Model

Enhancing IoT Data Dependability through a Blockchain Mirror Model

Digital preservation: some underlying issues for long-term preservation

DNS as Resolution Infrastructure for Persistent Identifiers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About