2015
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver variability of selective region‐of‐interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements

Abstract: While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During clinical usage, ROI RDSS was the most commonly used ROI selection method for measuring the ADC values. Previous studies indicated that since the ROI RDSS was commonly placed on the area where the tumor showed relative higher signal intensity on DW images, ROI RDSS tended to reflect the most solid, cellular or viable portion of the tumor (1120). However, our study results indicated that inter-reader variability was an major limitation of ROI RDSS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During clinical usage, ROI RDSS was the most commonly used ROI selection method for measuring the ADC values. Previous studies indicated that since the ROI RDSS was commonly placed on the area where the tumor showed relative higher signal intensity on DW images, ROI RDSS tended to reflect the most solid, cellular or viable portion of the tumor (1120). However, our study results indicated that inter-reader variability was an major limitation of ROI RDSS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion ADC measurements differ significantly depending on the ROI selection approach, which can range from sampling a small subregion to whole tumor 3D ROI methods, Figure 5. Differences in ADC are most dramatic in large, heterogeneous, and non mass lesions [37, 52, 53]. Some studies have reported that a smaller ROI placed over the most hypointense ADC area may provide better discriminating performance by reflecting the worst pathology within a heterogeneous lesion [37, 53].…”
Section: Considerations For Clinical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported that a smaller ROI placed over the most hypointense ADC area may provide better discriminating performance by reflecting the worst pathology within a heterogeneous lesion [37, 53]. On the other hand, whole tumor measurement may allow better reproducibility [52]. Semi-automated ROI selection techniques further show promise to improve efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility of breast lesion ADC measures [54].…”
Section: Considerations For Clinical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two readers selected a region of interest (ROI) within each STM so that the ROIs included the largest possible area of the STM, but carefully excluded surrounding extra‐lesional tissues. The slice used for each ROI was chosen as the slice having with the lowest visual signal within the STM on the ADC map, according to prior work by Ahlawat and colleagues . Minimum and average ADC values were recorded for each lesion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%