2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver and intraobserver variability affecting the assessment of loss of autofluorescence of oral mucosal lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large prospective studies including studies evaluating the genetic changes and progression rates associated with the “AFV suspicious” sites can be carried out. [ 28 29 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large prospective studies including studies evaluating the genetic changes and progression rates associated with the “AFV suspicious” sites can be carried out. [ 28 29 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized forms were used to collect all data. Diagnostic accuracy in terms of the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the SROC curve (AUCs), 1,3,6,12‐35 and the inter‐rater agreement of the autofluorescence analysis, 18,21,36 were analyzed. The screening performance of autofluorescence was compared with that of toluidine blue staining or clinical examination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12 13 14 15 16 17 ] Despite this, there is a disagreement of various studies about its clinical effectiveness, and the diagnostic efficacy of this tool is still much debated in scientific and clinical medical literature. [ 18 19 20 ] The availability of such efficient and effective tools from this point of view could help the in the early diagnosis, and also improving the quality of life of the patient by timely intervention, and in some cases guaranteeing a longer survival term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%