2001
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.111384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver agreement for EUS in the evaluation and diagnosis of submucosal masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
74
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been used effectively to identify gastric submucosal tumors. The effectiveness of EUS has been demonstrated to be at best for leiomyomas and poor for other submucosal tumors [13] . However, the level of experience of the endosonographer is a critical factor, as greater experience is associated with a high degree of accuracy [13] .…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been used effectively to identify gastric submucosal tumors. The effectiveness of EUS has been demonstrated to be at best for leiomyomas and poor for other submucosal tumors [13] . However, the level of experience of the endosonographer is a critical factor, as greater experience is associated with a high degree of accuracy [13] .…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of EUS has been demonstrated to be at best for leiomyomas and poor for other submucosal tumors [13] . However, the level of experience of the endosonographer is a critical factor, as greater experience is associated with a high degree of accuracy [13] . EUS is imperative prior to laparoscopic gastric resection to objectivate the depth of wall invasion, and tumor expansion inside the gastric wall and to evaluate the local and regional lymph nodes.…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, Gress et al, described how the agreement factor, called k factor, in diagnosing sub-epithelial masses is lower (k=0.34) compared to the examination of superficial lesions (k=0.53-0.8). Additionally, the rate of disagreement were higher between low experienced endosonographers; therefore the lowest the number of EUS performed, the higher the discordance (Gress et al, 2001). At the same time, the Italian group, in the context of the staging of PGL of MALT type, found a fair agreement for T description (k=0.38) and substantial agreement in N definition (k=0.63).…”
Section: Endoscopic Ultrasound In Staging Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 70%
“…If the lesion originates from the mucosal layer or submucosa layer, we give preference to endoscopic resection, such as high-frequency electric snare resection. Some esophageal leiomyomas originating from the muscularis propria may also be appropriate for endoscopic treatment, such as submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), endoscopic submucosal (8,9). If a lesion is difficult for endoscopic therapy, or the patient has obvious symptoms and require for treatment, or the endoscopic therapy was failed for the patient, surgery is preferred.…”
Section: Therapeutic Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%