2016
DOI: 10.1111/jir.12281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet use and online safety in adults with Williams syndrome

Abstract: Individuals with WS, who are a socially vulnerable group in the real world, display behaviours that could also lead to victimisation online as well. As the Internet continues to become more accessible, more research is needed to increase online safety of individuals with WS and other IDDs. Implications for intervention and future research are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(104 reference statements)
3
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several young people emphasise the risk of being bullied when using the Internet but it is especially found among adolescents with intellectual disabilities (Alper and Goggin, 2017;Normand and Sallafranque-St-Louis, 2016). Research demonstrates that persons with intellectual disabilities are not unaware of different online risks (Bannon et al, 2015;Molin et al, 2015) although risks for vulnerable groups such as young people with intellectual disabilities need further investigation (Chadwick et al, 2017;Eurostat, 2017;Lough and Fisher, 2016). Comparative studies of Internet use between people with intellectual disabilities and the general population are required to investigate digital participation and equalities and inequalities, for example, regarding risks with the Internet (Alper and Goggin, 2017;Chiner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several young people emphasise the risk of being bullied when using the Internet but it is especially found among adolescents with intellectual disabilities (Alper and Goggin, 2017;Normand and Sallafranque-St-Louis, 2016). Research demonstrates that persons with intellectual disabilities are not unaware of different online risks (Bannon et al, 2015;Molin et al, 2015) although risks for vulnerable groups such as young people with intellectual disabilities need further investigation (Chadwick et al, 2017;Eurostat, 2017;Lough and Fisher, 2016). Comparative studies of Internet use between people with intellectual disabilities and the general population are required to investigate digital participation and equalities and inequalities, for example, regarding risks with the Internet (Alper and Goggin, 2017;Chiner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is derived from a greater perception of potential risks (e.g. investing money, being sexually abused, giving credit to false information or being exposed to manipulative content) on the part of the caregivers in the use of the Internet that people with ID make (Chadwick, Quinn, and Fullwood 2017;Lough and Fisher 2016;Seale and Chadwick 2017). In this way, the potential benefits of its use can be mediated by the caregivers' fears that these people have problems online.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health information on websites is frequently not standardized and may be of poor quality or false. Moreover, such persons are more susceptible to victimization on social media and are more likely to be victims of cyberbullying due to communication impairment and social isolation [50]. Another problem is that some applications use sensitive data and use it for commercial purposes.…”
Section: Risks Related To the Use Of Telemedicine In People With Intementioning
confidence: 99%