2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31966-5_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet Routing Policies and Round-Trip-Times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These coordinates-based mechanisms suffer particularly from the fact that they provide Euclidean distances which are symmetric and satisfy the triangle inequality. This may not be consistent with the real network topology [27], [28], [29], [30]. Moreover, the authors in [32] indicate one more limitation that some peers probably do not have a direct path joining them.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These coordinates-based mechanisms suffer particularly from the fact that they provide Euclidean distances which are symmetric and satisfy the triangle inequality. This may not be consistent with the real network topology [27], [28], [29], [30]. Moreover, the authors in [32] indicate one more limitation that some peers probably do not have a direct path joining them.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Both these metrics point towards lower values for IXPALL which means not many AS-AS peering links are a part of the shortest paths between ASes. Zheng et al [38] show that routing policies and the layer 2 technology used on peering links may lead to cases of Triangle Inequality Violations (TIVs) [39,40] in the Internet and not necessarily provide significant savings on RTT measurements between ASes. With most detour paths [41] forming TIVs, peering links do not necessarily lead to shorter paths along the Internet.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For carriers that have high latency, we use traceroute data to investigate if the cause is inefficient routes to Google [12]. However, approximately half of the carriers such as SFR (French Carrier) and Swisscom have direct peering points with Google, making this unlikely to be the cause for high latency.…”
Section: Performance Across Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%