Internet of Things: A review to support IoT architecture's design

Saadeh, Huda; Almobaideen, Wesam; Sabri, Khair Eddin

doi:10.1109/it-dreps.2017.8277803

Cited by 22 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Usually, it is implemented as a multi-protocol broker. The authors describe in detail the different data acquisition platforms [ 12 , 13 ]. The most relevant alternatives are described in Table 1 .…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an IoT Platform Based on Service Containerisation

Antunes

Santiago

Manso

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IoT platforms have become quite complex from a technical viewpoint, becoming the cornerstone for information sharing, storing, and indexing given the unprecedented scale of smart services being available by massive deployments of a large set of data-enabled devices. These platforms rely on structured formats that exploit standard technologies to deal with the gathered data, thus creating the need for carefully designed customised systems that can handle thousands of heterogeneous data sensors/actuators, multiple processing frameworks, and storage solutions. We present the SCoT2.0 platform, a generic-purpose IoT Platform that can acquire, process, and visualise data using methods adequate for both real-time processing and long-term Machine Learning (ML)-based analysis. Our goal is to develop a large-scale system that can be applied to multiple real-world scenarios and is potentially deployable on private clouds for multiple verticals. Our approach relies on extensive service containerisation, and we present the different design choices, technical challenges, and solutions found while building our own IoT platform. We validate this platform supporting two very distinct IoT projects (750 physical devices), and we analyse scaling issues within the platform components.

show abstract

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an IoT Platform Based on Service Containerisation

Antunes

Santiago

Manso

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ponte () is an open-source project of the Eclipse Foundation that has attracted the attention of the developer and research communities [40,43,44,45]. This framework bridges various ALPs, i.e., MQTT, MQTT over Websockets, REST/HTTP, and CoAP, allowing micro-services implementing different protocols to communicate with one another.…”

Section: Platform Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi-Protocol IoT Platform Based on Open-Source Frameworks

Akasiadis

Pitsilis

Spyropoulos

2019

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things (IoT) technologies have evolved rapidly during the last decade, and many architecture types have been proposed for distributed and interconnected systems. However, most systems are implemented following fragmented approaches for specific application domains, introducing difficulties in providing unified solutions. However, the unification of solutions is an important feature from an IoT perspective. In this paper, we present an IoT platform that supports multiple application layer communication protocols (Representational State Transfer (REST)/HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT), Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), and Websockets) and that is composed of open-source frameworks (RabbitMQ, Ponte, OM2M, and RDF4J). We have explored a back-end system that interoperates with the various frameworks and offers a single approach for user-access control on IoT data streams and micro-services. The proposed platform is evaluated using its containerized version, being easily deployable on the vast majority of modern computing infrastructures. Its design promotes service reusability and follows a marketplace architecture, so that the creation of interoperable IoT ecosystems with active contributors is enabled. All the platform’s features are analyzed, and we discuss the results of experiments, with the multiple communication protocols being tested when used interchangeably for transferring data. Developing unified solutions using such a platform is of interest to users and developers as they can test and evaluate local instances or even complex applications composed of their own IoT resources before releasing a production version to the marketplace.

show abstract

“…It is expected that by the year 2020 about 50 billion devices will be connected through internet [15]. The "thing" is defined in [23] as, "A thing is any object with embedded electronics that can transfer data over a network-without any human interaction".…”

Section: Internet Of Things (Iot)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Performance Evaluation of Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks with User Mobility

Nikhat

Mehmet-Ali

2018

2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical &Amp; Computer Engineering (CCECE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MILLIMETER-WAVE CELLULAR NETWORKSWITH USER MOBILITY SHAMMA NABILA NIKHAT Millimeter-Wave (mmWave) communications may be the key technology for the realization of 5G networks. MmWave communications have significantly different propagation characteristics than microwave (μWave) frequencies. The recent studies have determined the performance of cellular mmWave networks using stochastic geometry technique assuming a stationary user. The stationary user model doesn't capture correlation in the blocking of the links as the user moves on.In this work, we have determined the performance seen by a mobile user traveling over a path at constant and varying speeds. We have obtained the cumulative information received by the user iii TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………………..v LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………………..vii LIST OF ACRONYMS …………………………………………………………………….....viii LIST OF SYMBOLS ……………………………………………………………………….......ix CHAPTER 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………......2 1.2 INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) …………………………………………………………...2 1.3 GOALS OF INTERNET OF THINGS ………………………………………………........3 1.4 INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) AND 5G ………………………………………………...3 1.5 REQUIREMENTS OF 5G …………………………………………………………………4 1.6 PROPOSED SOLUTION TO 5G ………………………………………………………….5 1.7 RELATED WORK …………………………………………………………………………9 1.8 ORGANIZATION AND CONTRIBUTION OF THE THESIS………………………...11 CHAPTER 2 2.1 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………….14 2.2 SYSTEM MODEL ………………………………………………………………………....14 2.3 SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT ………………………………………………………..18 2.3.1 BASE STATIONS …………………………………………………………….……....19 2.3.2 BLOCKINGS …………………………………………….………….………………...19 2.3.3 USER MOBILITY ………………………………………………….…………….…...20 2.4 SIMULATION RESULTS ………………………………………………………………...20 2.5 CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………….38 iv CHAPTER 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………40 3.2 SYSTEM MODEL …………………………………………………………………………41 3.2.1 DETERMINING THE PROBABILITY OF NO HANDOVER DIFFERENT LOCATIONS OF TAGGED BASE STATIONS………………………………………………..41 3.2.2 DETERMINIG PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF PATH LENGTH WITHOUT HANDOVER ………………………………………..…………………………………………..54 3.3 RESULTS …………………………………………………………………………………..57 3.4 CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………….60 CHAPTER 4

show abstract

Internet of Things: A review to support IoT architecture's design

Cited by 22 publications

References 24 publications

Building an IoT Platform Based on Service Containerisation

Building an IoT Platform Based on Service Containerisation

A Multi-Protocol IoT Platform Based on Open-Source Frameworks

A Performance Evaluation of Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks with User Mobility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About