Internet Indirection Infrastructure

Stoica, Ion; Adkins, Daniel; Zhuang, Shelley; Shenker, Scott; Surana, Sonesh

doi:10.1109/tnet.2004.826279

Cited by 315 publications

(169 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

168

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The overlay-based Internet Indirection Infrastructure (i3) routing system, for example, aims to simplify network services' deployment and management by decoupling the acts of sending and receiving. 6 This additional level of indirection allows for more flexibility in node mobility and in service location and deployment. Researchers are also successfully deploying overlay networks as part of distributed storage systems, such as the cooperative file system.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overlay networks a scalable alternative for p2p

Doval¹,

O’Mahony²

2003

IEEE Internet Comput.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overlay networks a scalable alternative for p2p

Doval¹,

O’Mahony²

2003

IEEE Internet Comput.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Most existing P2P systems either use centralized servers to provide NAT connectivity [23] or do not support NAT connectivity at all [18]. The idea of connecting public nodes using a SON and having private nodes as clients originated with the Internet Indirection Infrastructure [26], although it did not address NAT traversal. The most similar system to Usurp is Maidsafe SON, a commercial implementation of Kademlia [15], where public nodes act as rendezvous servers.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usurp: Distributed NAT Traversal for Overlay Networks

Niazi¹,

Dowling²

2011

Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Perhaps the idea that comes closest to ours is that of i3 [11]. In this work, the overlay paradigm is taken further to provide a common "indirection infrastructure" that is interposed between the two parties in a transaction.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Service Oriented Internet

Chandrashekar

Zhang²,

Duan³

et al. 2006

IEICE Transactions on Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYToday's Internet remains faithful to its original design that dates back more than two decades. In spite of tremendous diversity in users, as well as the sheer variety of applications that it supports, it still provides a single, basic, service offering-unicast packet delivery. While this legacy architecture seemed adequate till recently, it cannot support the requirements of newer services and applications which are demanded by the growing, and increasingly sophisticated, user population. The traditional way to solve this impasse has been by using overlay networks to address individual requirements. This does not address the fundamental, underlying problem, i.e., the ossification of the Internet architecture. In this paper, we describe the design of a new Service Oriented Internet framework that enables the flexible and effective deployment of new applications and services. The framework we describe utilizes the existing IP network and presents the abstraction of a service layer that enables communication between service end-points and can better support requirements such as availability, robustness, mobility, etc., that are demanded by the newly emerging applications and services.

show abstract

Internet Indirection Infrastructure

Cited by 315 publications

References 22 publications

Overlay networks a scalable alternative for p2p

Overlay networks a scalable alternative for p2p

Usurp: Distributed NAT Traversal for Overlay Networks

Towards a Service Oriented Internet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About