Internet Game Overuse Is Associated With an Alteration of Fronto-Striatal Functional Connectivity During Reward Feedback Processing

Abstract

Internet gaming disorder is associated with abnormal reward processing in the reward circuit, which is known to interact with other brain regions during feedback learning. Kim et al. (1) observed that individuals with internet game overuse (IGO) exhibit altered behavior and neural activity for non-monetary reward, but not for monetary reward. Here, we extend our analysis of IGO to the functional connectivity of the reward network. Functional MRI data were obtained during a stimulus-response association learning task from 18 young males with IGO and 20 age-matched controls, where either monetary or non-monetary rewards were given as positive feedback for a correct response. Group differences in task-dependent functional connectivity were examined for the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum (VS), which are known for reward evaluation and hedonic response processing, respectively, using a generalized form of the psychophysiological interaction approach. For non-monetary reward processing, no differences in functional connectivity were found. In contrast, for monetary reward, connectivity of the vmPFC with the left caudate nucleus was weaker for the IGO group relative to controls, while vmPFC connectivity with the right nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was elevated. The strength of vmPFC-NAcc functional connectivity appeared to be behaviorally relevant, because individuals with stronger vmPFC-NAcc connectivity showed lower learning rates for monetary reward. In addition, the IGO group showed weaker ventral striatum functional connectivity with various brain regions, including the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate regions, and left pallidum. Thus, for monetary reward, the IGO group exhibited stronger functional connectivity within the brain regions involved in motivational salience, whereas they showed reduced functional connectivity the widely distributed brain areas involved in learning or attention. These differences in functional connectivity of reward networks, along with related behavioral impairments of reward learning, suggest that internet gaming disorder is associated with the increased incentive salience or “wanting” of addiction disorders, and may serve as the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the impaired goal-directed behavior.

Concurrent behavioral modelling and multimodal neuroimaging reveals how feedback affects the performance of decision making in internet gaming disorder

“…First, our behavioral results and modeling parameter findings indicate that individuals with IGD exhibit a heightened inclination towards risk-taking behaviors compared to HCs, which is consistent with previous research on risky propensity of IGD in both ambiguity decision making (Jiang, Li, Zhou, & Zhou, 2020; J. Kim & Kang, 2018) and risky decision making (Ko, Wang et al, 2017; Q. Li, Wang et al, 2020; L.…”

Potential Biological Markers and Treatment Implications for Binge Eating Disorder and Behavioral Addictions

“…The functional coupling between dorsal ACC and VS may be involved in feedback learning. Therefore, the alterations presented by individuals with IGD may imply difficulties in representing value signals attached to action outcome relationships and, consequently, learning problems [ 98 ].…”

Higher Trait Impulsivity and Altered Frontostriatal Connectivity in Betel-Quid Dependent Individuals

“…It is worth noting that the striatum and prefrontal cortex are intermodulations by frontostriatal circuits (Volkow et al, 2011(Volkow et al, , 2012Saad et al, 2019). The interactions between the striatum and prefrontal cortex are especially important to investigate the underlying neural mechanism of addiction, such as smoking (Kober et al, 2010) and internet gaming disorder (Yuan K. et al, 2017;Kim and Kang, 2018). Previous studies revealed structural and functional alterations in the prefrontal cortex and caudate in individuals with BQD relative to healthy controls (Liu et al, 2016b;Sariah et al, 2019).…”