Internet based vascular risk factor management for patients with clinically manifest vascular disease: randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether an internet based, nurse led vascular risk factor management programme promoting self management on top of usual care is more effective than usual care alone in reducing vascular risk factors in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease. Design Prospective randomised controlled trial.Setting Multicentre trial in secondary and tertiary healthcare setting.Participants 330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral arteries and with at least two treatable risk factors not at goal.Intervention Personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients' risk factors and mail communication via the website with a nurse practitioner for 12 months; the intervention combined self management support, monitoring of disease control, and drug treatment. Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the relative change in Framingham heart risk score after 1 year. Secondary endpoints were absolute changes in the levels of risk factors and the differences between groups in the change in proportion of patients reaching treatment goals for each risk factor.Results Participants' mean age was 59.9 (SD 8.4) years, and most patients (n=246; 75%) were male. After 1 year, the relative change in Framingham heart risk score of the intervention group compared with the usual care group was −14% (95% confidence interval −25% to −2%). At baseline, the Framingham heart risk score was higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group (16.1 (SD 10.6) v 14.0 (10.5)), so the outcome was adjusted for the separate variables of the Framingham heart risk score and for the baseline Framingham heart risk score. This produced a relative change of −12% (−22% to −3%) in Framingham heart risk score for the intervention group compared with the usual care group adjusted for the separate variables of the score and −8% (−18% to 2%) adjusted for the baseline score. Of the individual risk factors, a difference between groups was observed in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (−0.3, −0.5 to −0.1, mmol/L) and smoking (−7.7%, −14.9% to −0.4%). Some other risk factors tended to improve (body mass index, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, renal function) or tended to worsen (glucose concentration, albuminuria). ConclusionAn internet based, nurse led treatment programme on top of usual care for vascular risk factors had a small effect on lowering vascular risk and on lowering of some vascular risk factors in patients with vascular disease. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00785031. IntroductionPatients with a recent clinical manifestation of a vascular disease (such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease) are at increased risk for developing a new vascular event or death.1 More patients survive an acute vascular event nowadays, and as a consequence the total number of patients in the chronic phase of vascular disease is increasing. Established strategies to reduce vascular risk are treating hypertensi...

Effect of a nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk after an acute coronary syndrome: main results of the RESPONSE randomised trial

“…For lack of a validated risk function in secondary prevention, we selected the SCORE function for 10-year cardiovascular risk as the primary outcome in our secondary prevention trial. A recently published, comparable trial has similarly used a primary prevention risk score as the main outcome measure to quantify the effect of a secondary prevention programme 16. Although the absolute estimates of the SCORE function are inaccurate in secondary prevention, the difference in SCORE between the two groups provides an estimate of the relative overall impact of a risk factor intervention.…”

An evidence-based approach to the use of telehealth in long-term health conditions: development of an intervention and evaluation through pragmatic randomised controlled trials in patients with depression or raised cardiovascular risk

“…61 A more recent study from the Netherlands reported the findings of an online nurse practitioner-supported intervention for vascular risk management in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease. 376 Although…”

Case management for blood pressure and lipid level control after minor stroke: PREVENTION randomized controlled trial

“…However, our study setting closely resembles the United Kingdom National Health Service and integrated managed care organizations in the United States, and the clinical profiles of our participants were similar to recent reports of stroke survivors from other Canadian provinces, the US, the UK and Europe. 1,2,10,20,24,25,28 When considering the external validity of our results, the under-treatment of vascular risk factors is a nearly universal phenomenon and has been documented in many other settings and for other atherosclerotic conditions.…”

“…15,20 Although 2 recent trials 21,22 involving younger patients with uncontrolled hypertension reported similar systolic blood pressure reductions and blood pressure control rates with the involvement of pharmacist case managers, our study enrolled older higher-risk patients with lower systolic blood pressure at baseline; we also assessed the impact of a pharmacist case manager on a wider array of vascular risk factors. The observed reductions in systolic blood pressure in the nurse-led active control group were just as large as those in the pharmacist case manager group, which is consistent with our previous findings about the efficacy of our nurse-led active control intervention for blood pressure reduction.…”