2013
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review

Abstract: It is theoretically possible but perhaps difficult to test the effectiveness of health interventions rigorously with RCTs conducted fully or primarily over the internet. The use of the internet to conduct trials is more suited to pragmatic rather than explanatory trials. The main limitation of these trials is that they typically experience high rates of loss to follow-up. Methodological standards now accepted for traditional RCTs needs to be evident for online RCTs as well, especially in reporting of their met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
82
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(26 reference statements)
9
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High dropout rates are typical for internet-based intervention studies (Mathieu, McGeechan, Barratt, & Herbert, 2013), particularly intervention groups (e.g. Powell et al, 2012).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High dropout rates are typical for internet-based intervention studies (Mathieu, McGeechan, Barratt, & Herbert, 2013), particularly intervention groups (e.g. Powell et al, 2012).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,54 To advance the science of Internet interventions and leverage their potential for broad reach and population level impact, future research should explicitly address the questions of "how" and "for whom." Intervention approaches that explicitly and intentionally target theory-driven mediators and moderators of treatment effectiveness and that maximize engagement may help realize the potential impact of web-based cessation programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internet-recruited samples have been shown to be more demographically diverse (35) compared to samples recruited using non-Internet methods. A systematic review of Internet-based randomized controlled trials (36) noted that the Internet greatly increases geographic and demographic reach and that Internet-based trials may actually increase access to populations that are difficult to reach via traditional recruitment methods (e.g., rural adults, individuals not seeking medical attention). It is not yet clear, though, if Internet-based trials can manage to overcome the failure in clinical trials to recruit underrepresented participants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%