Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances

Abstract

BackgroundEducational courses for doctors and medical students are increasingly offered via the Internet. Despite much research, course developers remain unsure about what (if anything) to offer online and how. Prospective learners lack evidence-based guidance on how to choose between the options on offer. We aimed to produce theory driven criteria to guide the development and evaluation of Internet-based medical courses.MethodsRealist review - a qualitative systematic review method whose goal is to identify and explain the interaction between context, mechanism and outcome. We searched 15 electronic databases and references of included articles, seeking to identify theoretical models of how the Internet might support learning from empirical studies which (a) used the Internet to support learning, (b) involved doctors or medical students; and (c) reported a formal evaluation. All study designs and outcomes were considered. Using immersion and interpretation, we tested theories by considering how well they explained the different outcomes achieved in different educational contexts.Results249 papers met our inclusion criteria. We identified two main theories of the course-in-context that explained variation in learners' satisfaction and outcomes: Davis's Technology Acceptance Model and Laurillard's model of interactive dialogue. Learners were more likely to accept a course if it offered a perceived advantage over available non-Internet alternatives, was easy to use technically, and compatible with their values and norms. 'Interactivity' led to effective learning only if learners were able to enter into a dialogue - with a tutor, fellow students or virtual tutorials - and gain formative feedback.ConclusionsDifferent modes of course delivery suit different learners in different contexts. When designing or choosing an Internet-based course, attention must be given to the fit between its technical attributes and learners' needs and priorities; and to ways of providing meaningful interaction. We offer a preliminary set of questions to aid course developers and learners consider these issues.

Outreach programmes for health improvement of Traveller Communities: a synthesis of evidence

“…mentoring, 98 internet education, 217 participatory research 218 ) and test underlying mechanisms of action in a variety of contexts. Here, the context of outreach was stipulated by the funding body.…”

Review article: New directions in medical education related to anesthesiology and perioperative medicine

“…There is constant evolution of simulation technology, 75 which is increasingly recognized as offering a unique learning opportunity 76 without exposing patients to risk. 77 It is an ongoing challenge to determine how simulation and other educational technologies, such as e-learning, 78 can best be integrated into existing anesthesiology curricula. Much of professional practice in anesthesiology relates to interactions with other specialties and healthcare professionals.…”

Primary Care Staff Perspectives on a Virtual Learning Collaborative to Support Medical Home Implementation

“…Understanding such "course-context interactions" is critical, as it is these interactions rather than the intrinsic features of the "course" that explain what makes a program such as the VC succeed or not. 24 The two factors most consistently linked to ratings of the VC were respondents' degree of engagement in the VC and their exposure to prior PACT training. Respondents who were fully engaged in the VC found it more useful, more acceptable, and, interestingly, less disruptive, even though this group presumably devoted more time to VC activities and might plausibly be expected to have experienced more disruption.…”

“…19, p.1195 Others building on this work highlight issues related to learner engagement with technology, creating opportunities for meaningful interaction, and "course-context interactions" that may influence a course's success more than any intrinsic feature of the course itself. 24 …”