Internet-Based Extinction Therapy for Worry: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Andersson, Erik; Hedman, Erik; Wadström, Olle; Boberg, Julia; Andersson, Emil; Axelsson, Erland; Bjureberg, Johan; Hursti, Timo; Ljótsson, Brjánn

doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.07.003

Cited by 24 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For some conditions like depression and social anxiety disorders there are more than 15 trials each, whereas for some conditions there are just one trial or even unpublished work. In addition to my work Swedish colleagues have done several additional studies, not seldom being former students of mine ( Andersson et al, 2017 ). Returning to Table 1 it is interesting to reflect on the outcome of all these trials.…”

Section: Short-term Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet interventions: Past, present and future

Andersson¹

2018

Internet Interventions

236

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet interventions have been around now for about 20 years. While the field still suffers from a scattered terminology a large number of programs and studies exist. In the present paper I present an overview of my experiences of studying internet-supported cognitive-behaviour therapy (ICBT), but also mention other approaches including the use of smartphones. The paper covers the history of ICBT, short-term effects in controlled trials for a range of conditions, long-term effects, comparisons against face-to-face therapy, effectiveness studies, prediction studies, how the treatment is perceived, critique, and finally future directions. I conclude that we have now reached a stage in which we have numerous evidence-based treatments and procedures, and increasingly internet interventions including ICBT are disseminated.

show abstract

Section: Short-term Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet interventions: Past, present and future

Andersson¹

2018

Internet Interventions

236

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although higher adherence has been shown to be linked to larger intervention effects in numerous trials [23-28], other trials [29-33] found no impact of adherence on outcomes. Heterogeneous methods for measuring and reporting adherence as well as examining the dose-response relationship between adherence and outcome and neglecting to consider differential usage patterns may contribute to these conflicting findings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adherence Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Manualized Multisession Online Interventions: Systematic Review of Practices and Proposal for Reporting Standards

Beintner¹,

Vollert²,

Zarski³

et al. 2019

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Adherence reflects the extent to which individuals experience or engage with the content of online interventions and poses a major challenge. Neglecting to examine and report adherence and its relation to outcomes can compromise the interpretation of research findings. Objective The aim of this systematic review is to analyze how adherence is accounted for in publications and to propose standards for measuring and reporting adherence to online interventions. Methods We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on online interventions for the prevention and treatment of common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, substance related disorders, and eating disorders) published between January 2006 and May 2018 and indexed in Medline and Web of Science. We included primary publications on manualized online treatments (more than 1 session and successive access to content) and examined how adherence was reported in these publications. Results We identified 216 publications that met our inclusion criteria. Adherence was addressed in 85% of full-text manuscripts, but only in 31% of abstracts. A median of three usage metrics were reported; the most frequently reported usage metric (61%) was intervention completion. Manuscripts published in specialized electronic health journals more frequently included information on the relation of adherence and outcomes. Conclusions We found substantial variety in the reporting of adherence and the usage metrics used to operationalize adherence. This limits the comparability of results and impedes the integration of findings from different studies. Based on our findings, we propose reporting standards for future publications on online interventions.

show abstract

“…Besides disorder-specific treatments, both transdiagnostic (Andersson et al, 2017;Dear et al, 2015;Johnston, Titov, Andrews, Spence, & Dear, 2011;Titov et al, 2015) and tailored treatments (Carlbring et al, 2011;Nordgren et al, 2014) have been found to be effective in reducing GAD symptoms and other comorbid symptoms. However, the disorder-specific treatments generally lead to a slightly stronger effects on GAD outcomes, compared with the other types of treatments (Titov et al, 2016).…”

Section: Treatment Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of an internet-based treatment for generalized anxiety disorder : An acceptance-based approach

Dahlin

2020

Linköping Studies in Behavioural Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ni är många som varit med på den resa som lett fram till den här avhandlingen. En del av er genom ert engagemang i allt arbete som ligger bakom en avhandling. Andra för att ni är en del av mitt liv och därigenom påverkat den jag är och vad jag gör. Tack till er alla för att ni finns i mitt liv! Särskilda tack vill jag rikta till… Min huvudhandledare Gerhard Andersson för all den tid, kunskap och tilltro som du har fyllt mitt liv med sedan jag sökte upp dig som psykologstudent och ville göra ett examensarbete. Det har blivit många lärorika och inspirerande år med samarbeten, artiklar och till slut en avhandling. Jag ser fram mot fler spännande samarbeten och lärdomar även efter detta. Min bihandledare Per Carlbring för din entusiasm, energi och blixtsnabba arbete i alla de studier vi gjort tillsammans. Utan dig skulle det vara mycket tråkigare att forska! Erik Andersson för din inspirerande insats som opponent på mitt halvtidsseminarium. Det var verkligen en positiv injektion i arbetet med avhandlingen. Alexander Rozental för din värdefulla feedback i egenskap av opponent på slutseminariet. Tack vare dig känner jag mig bättre rustad för disputationen, något jag är mycket tacksam för. Min opponent på disputationen, Rikard Wicksell. Tack för ditt engagemang! Alla forskarkollegor och doktorander som jag stött på genom åren. Ni har alla berikat min tillvaro och forskning. Jag vill även specifikt tacka Matilda Berg för din glädje, närvaro och nyfikenhet i våra samtal, du har verkligen haft en positiv inverkan på min tid som doktorand. Tack Örn Kolbeinsson och Anton Käll för alla stimulerande samtal och att ni delat med er av er kunskap om metod. Tack Tomas Lindegaard för spännande samtal om olika perspektiv i behandling. Alla som arbetat i studierna och medförfattare.

show abstract

Internet-Based Extinction Therapy for Worry: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 24 publications

References 41 publications

Internet interventions: Past, present and future

Internet interventions: Past, present and future

Adherence Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Manualized Multisession Online Interventions: Systematic Review of Practices and Proposal for Reporting Standards

Development and evaluation of an internet-based treatment for generalized anxiety disorder : An acceptance-based approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About