Internationale Tendenzen in der Entwicklung des Jugendstrafrechts

Albrecht, Hans-Jörg

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92131-0_3

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many software programs meet these requirements, thus further evaluation is necessary. An example of such an evaluation was presented by Albrecht (2010), who identifies 87 discrete event simulation and modelling tools which include simulation programming languages. Albrecht (2010) then combines the guidelines for selecting the simulation software from Ahmed et al (2003), Banks and Gibson (1997), Hlupic, et al (1999), and Page (1994).…”

Section: Selecting Simulation Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

“…An example of such an evaluation was presented by Albrecht (2010), who identifies 87 discrete event simulation and modelling tools which include simulation programming languages. Albrecht (2010) then combines the guidelines for selecting the simulation software from Ahmed et al (2003), Banks and Gibson (1997), Hlupic, et al (1999), and Page (1994). When selecting the simulation, the procedure covers seven major areas to look at (Albrecht, 2010) the cost of the package, ease of use, and ease of installation together with hardware requirements.…”

Section: Selecting Simulation Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Albrecht (2010) then combines the guidelines for selecting the simulation software from Ahmed et al (2003), Banks and Gibson (1997), Hlupic, et al (1999), and Page (1994). When selecting the simulation, the procedure covers seven major areas to look at (Albrecht, 2010) the cost of the package, ease of use, and ease of installation together with hardware requirements. In this study, the simulation tools AutoMod (manufacturing-oriented software) and SimMine (mining-oriented software) were used to model the Kiirunavaara mine.…”

Section: Selecting Simulation Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The AutoMod and SimMine software evaluation (Table 4) is based on the modelling package evaluation table from Albrecht (2010). The software features presented in Table 4 differ extensively favouring the AutoMod due to its wide range of additional facilities that are provided for modelling.…”

Section: Simulation Software Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Selection of Discrete Event Simulation Software for Simulating Mining Operations

Skawina¹,

Salama²,

Greberg³

et al. 2023

TJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simulation is a tool that can be used to predict and evaluate the performance of mining systems. It has been used for various applications such as fleet optimization in underground mining, comparison of timing and efficiency between drills, and mine-to-mill production systems. Due to the availability of a large number of simulation tools, careful selection should be made depending on the type of problem to be simulated. The study presented in this paper aims to compare two different simulation tools, AutoMod and SimMine, by comparing the two underground loading models created. This is achieved by analysing different equipment alternatives for possible future conditions when the mine depth increases. Both tools produce statistically equivalent results for simulated production. The paper presents a discussion regarding the choice of software and based on the study, SimMine is recommended for easy, fast modelling, whereas AutoMod, with its wider palette of software features and facilities provided, is recommended for more enhanced and detailed mining simulations. The study is based on the mining operation in the Kiirunavaara underground mine in Sweden, and the simulation is conducted based on a fixed production target.

show abstract