2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International wood trade and forest change: A global analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Roundwood can be broadly split into fuelwood (FAO code 1629), charcoal (FAO code 1630), and industrial roundwood (FAO code 1865). Since fuelwood and charcoal are primarily for domestic uses, and often in the informal economy (Kastner et al, 2011a;FAO, 2012c), we only include industrial roundwood in our analysis.…”
Section: Forestry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Roundwood can be broadly split into fuelwood (FAO code 1629), charcoal (FAO code 1630), and industrial roundwood (FAO code 1865). Since fuelwood and charcoal are primarily for domestic uses, and often in the informal economy (Kastner et al, 2011a;FAO, 2012c), we only include industrial roundwood in our analysis.…”
Section: Forestry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare three methods of allocation using the GTAP-MRIO with the results of Kastner et al (2011a) and Ciais et al (2008) in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, distant interactions such as trade, transnational land deals, spread of invasive species, and technology transfer are now more prevalent, and occur more quickly, than ever before (Liu et al 2007a; Appendix 1). For instance, many subsistence needs, e.g., food such as grain and fish and water resources, historically met by local resource uses are now being met by increased global trade (Kastner et al 2011, Konar et al 2011). In the past several decades, the world's total food exports have increased tenfold (United Nations Statistics Division 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.resci.cn 至 15% [9] 条重要的经验路径 [14] 。Lambin 等作出进一步扩展, 总结出五种森林转型路径: 森林稀缺路径、 国家森 林政策路径、 经济发展路径、 土地利用集约化路径 和全球化路径 [15] 。其中, 森林稀缺路径认为林产品 或森林生态服务的稀缺会提高林产品价格, 从而激 励政府或私人部门实施有效的造林计划, 促进森林 资源增长 [14,16] [17][18][19] ; 经济发展路径关注经济增长和城市化水平 的提高对森林资源恢复的影响 [10][11][12] ; 土地利用集约 化路径关注耕地的生产效率以及耕地与林业用地 间相互转化关系 [20][21][22] 。 在上述路径中, 森林转型的全球化路径是当前 学术界研究的前沿问题。现有研究主要关注农林 产品贸易及相关 "溢出效应" [23][24][25] , 侨汇经济增长 [26] , 国外移民 [27, 28] , 以及国际旅游发展 [29] 等因素对森林转 型的影响。在全球化的影响下, 人口流动目的地从 本国城市扩展到国外经济发达地区, 追求高收入的 劳动力可从国外汇款到农村地区, 从而减少生计对 当地森林等自然资源的压力 [30] 。在塞尔瓦多, 收到 汇款的家庭砍伐相对较少的森林 [11] 。全球旅游业的 发展则有助于生态保护理念的传播 [31] 。 "溢出效应"…”
Section: 李凌超等: 中国劳动力转移对森林转型的影响unclassified