2007
DOI: 10.1124/pr.59.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXVII. Recommendations for the Recognition and Nomenclature of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromultimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
235
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
235
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vivo contribution of both receptors, as evidenced by reduced potency of SNC80 in both δ-and μ-knockout animals, is also one of three specific criteria for the establishment of the heteromeric complex established by IUPHAR guidelines. 23 Additionally, our in vitro efficacy data demonstrating selective activation of μ−δ heteromers by SNC80 is further supported by trafficking and binding studies. 17,24 That these trafficking studies revealed SNC80-induced cointernalization of μ-and δ-opioid receptors is consistent with activation of a μ−δ heteromer as the signaling unit.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…The in vivo contribution of both receptors, as evidenced by reduced potency of SNC80 in both δ-and μ-knockout animals, is also one of three specific criteria for the establishment of the heteromeric complex established by IUPHAR guidelines. 23 Additionally, our in vitro efficacy data demonstrating selective activation of μ−δ heteromers by SNC80 is further supported by trafficking and binding studies. 17,24 That these trafficking studies revealed SNC80-induced cointernalization of μ-and δ-opioid receptors is consistent with activation of a μ−δ heteromer as the signaling unit.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Nonetheless, the mechanism of the interaction mediating receptor heteromerization does not appear to be necessary for the classification of a receptor heteromer as recommended by the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (Pin et al, 2007), whereby receptor heteromers can be accepted by the scientific community provided their existence in native tissue has been firmly demonstrated. In line with this, at least two of the following criteria should be met: (1) There is evidence for physical association in native tissues or primary cells, preferably through the use of energy transfer technologies or antibodies selective for specific receptor oligomers (Wager-Miller et al, 2002), (2) A specific functional property for the receptor heteromer is known so receptors in native tissue can be identified, and (3) the existence of the heteromer was confirmed in vivo through the use of knockout animals or RNAi technology.…”
Section: The Receptor Interface: Receptor Homomers Versus Receptor Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few cases, such as the γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA B ) receptor and other family-C GPCRs, di-/oligomerization is essential for receptor function (10)(11)(12). It is now well established that functional GABA B receptors consist of a GABA B1 subunit (which binds GABA but cannot activate G proteins) and a GABA B2 subunit (which is binding deficient but can signal to G proteins) (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GPCRs were initially thought to be monomeric, evidence accumulated over the past two decades suggests that they can form dimers or oligomers in intact cells (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). In a few cases, such as the γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA B ) receptor and other family-C GPCRs, di-/oligomerization is essential for receptor function (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation