2023
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-023-00614-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International taxation and the organizational form of foreign direct investment

Abstract: We investigate the relation between international taxation and the organizational form of foreign direct investment (FDI). Using micro-level data on inbound FDI relations in Germany, we find that a higher tax burden on income earned in a corporate subsidiary increases the probability that a multinational corporation (MNC) conducts foreign investment through a non-corporate flow-through. This effect is economically meaningful and varies with the relative importance of tax-motivated income shifting, a subsidiary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the traditional international tax governance order, the western developed countries, represented by the United States, are the dominant and main participants. No matter the formulation of rules or the exercise of voting rights, developed countries occupy a monopoly position, while developing countries can only passively accept existing international tax rules (Amberger et al, 2023;Mongrain et al, 2023). Since four economists from the Netherlands, Italy, Britain and the United States issued the Report on the Prevention of Double Taxation in 1923 to form international tax rules, developed capitalist countries have always firmly grasped the right to formulate global tax rules in terms of topic discussion and personnel appointment.…”
Section: The Participation Power Of Global Tax Governance Has Changedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the traditional international tax governance order, the western developed countries, represented by the United States, are the dominant and main participants. No matter the formulation of rules or the exercise of voting rights, developed countries occupy a monopoly position, while developing countries can only passively accept existing international tax rules (Amberger et al, 2023;Mongrain et al, 2023). Since four economists from the Netherlands, Italy, Britain and the United States issued the Report on the Prevention of Double Taxation in 1923 to form international tax rules, developed capitalist countries have always firmly grasped the right to formulate global tax rules in terms of topic discussion and personnel appointment.…”
Section: The Participation Power Of Global Tax Governance Has Changedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He does not elaborate on taxation and hybrid entities as well as the tax‐induced choice of the legal form. Amberger and Kohlhase (2022) deal with the benefits of flow‐through entities in foreign direct investment and the tax burden. However, they do not analyze hybrid entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%