2005
DOI: 10.1891/194589505787382559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Survey of Dynamic Assessment Trainers

Abstract: The authors conducted an e-mail survey of persons who train practitioners to do dynamic assessment (DA). The report presents the opinions and recommendations of 29 DA trainers from 14 countries. The brief survey includes recommendations and suggestions about credentials, time required for training, content, and follow-up policies for individuals who are being trained to become DA practitioners. The participants generally agree that a broad range of credentialed practitioners could be appropriate for DA trainin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many are disinclined to trust computers as a way forward, citing human mediation and expertise as key; Deutsch asserted that the requirements go far beyond simple test administration [18]. Haywood and Lidz emphasise the indispensability of specialised training and emphatically advocate restricting DA facilitation to experienced (human) professionals [61,143]. There is much to support such a thesis, but this should not preclude the adoption of technology to expedite DA procedures under the learned direction of experienced practitioners.…”
Section: Prioritising the Sociotechnical Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many are disinclined to trust computers as a way forward, citing human mediation and expertise as key; Deutsch asserted that the requirements go far beyond simple test administration [18]. Haywood and Lidz emphasise the indispensability of specialised training and emphatically advocate restricting DA facilitation to experienced (human) professionals [61,143]. There is much to support such a thesis, but this should not preclude the adoption of technology to expedite DA procedures under the learned direction of experienced practitioners.…”
Section: Prioritising the Sociotechnical Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, interest in Dynamic Assessment (DA) as an alternative form of cognitive assessment has grown considerably in the UK in recent years (Deutsch and Reynolds, 2000;Stringer, Elliot and Lauchlan, 1997). In contrast to SA whereby any kind of interaction or assistance during the assessment is considered unacceptable, unfair or even cheating as it is considered as a threat to the reliability of test scores (Haywood and Lidz, 2007), DA adopts a categorically different stance to SA and maintains that important information about a learner's abilities can only be obtained by offering assistance during assessment. Poehner and Lantolf (2005) argue that "…the express goal of Dynamic Assessment is to unify assessment and instruction into a single activity, the goal of which is learner development" (p. 254).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%