2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Surgical Efforts within U.S Academic Institutions: Results of a Survey by the AAS/SUS Joint Committee on International Academic Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results compare with those of a recent survey by the Association for Academic Surgery and Society for University Surgeons Joint Committee on International Academic Surgery [15]. The Committee polled US academic surgical centers and found that 70% of centers had no means of acknowledging faculty who had volunteered internationally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…These results compare with those of a recent survey by the Association for Academic Surgery and Society for University Surgeons Joint Committee on International Academic Surgery [15]. The Committee polled US academic surgical centers and found that 70% of centers had no means of acknowledging faculty who had volunteered internationally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…A survey performed by the Society of University Surgeons and the Association for Academic Surgery showed as few as 30% of academic medical centres in the USA held international partnerships and 70% of these partnerships were unfunded or relied on variable funding; 41% of the programmes reported a lack of allowance for time off to engage in international work. 27 Even though there has been a rise in global surgery engagement, there is currently inadequate infrastructure in place to support these longitudinal partnerships in the USA. Policy changes in academic medical centres in HIC that allow for time away and funding to engage in international partnerships can promote desired long-term, long-distance, collaborative research between HIC and LMIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%