2021
DOI: 10.46292/sci2702-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each muscle was scored from 0-5 (Muscle Motor Score; MMS) following the recommendations of the ISNCSCI. 31,40 Thus, the total motor score has a maximum of 50 per side, and 100 per person. The upper extremity motor score (UEMS) consists of a maximum of 25 per side and 50 per person.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each muscle was scored from 0-5 (Muscle Motor Score; MMS) following the recommendations of the ISNCSCI. 31,40 Thus, the total motor score has a maximum of 50 per side, and 100 per person. The upper extremity motor score (UEMS) consists of a maximum of 25 per side and 50 per person.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use proprioception of the ankle and knee to evaluate end-effector RAGT effects in SCI patients. Only three articles have been published regarding end-effector RAGT in SCI patients [16,17,19]. One of them evaluated BBS for outcome measures, but this was a feasibility study in two patients with SCI [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grade of 1 (impaired) indicates that the patient can consistently report joint movement with 8 of 10 correct answers only on large movement of the joint. A grade of 2 (normal) indicates that the patient can consistently report joint movement with 8 of 10 correct answers both small (approximately 10 • of motion) and large movement [19]. Our purpose in evaluating proprioception was to reveal the effects of the end-effector robot on proprioception.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediate post-operative CT cervical spine imaging was unremarkable. Clinically, he was classified as incomplete tetraplegia, C5 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale B (AIS B) SC injury [22] .…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%