1990
DOI: 10.1016/0920-5489(90)90055-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International standardized profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different interpretations for term "profile" exist. An insightful discussion on this topic can be found on the Library of Congress (LOC) website [16], according to which only some SensorML profiles mentioned in the literature should be considered International Standardized Profiles (ISP) (see also [17]), that is, "An Internationally agreed to, harmonized document which identifies a standard or group of standards, together with options and parameters, necessary to accomplish a function or set of functions". Instead, other SensorML profiles could better correspond to the weaker notion of profile that the LOC puts forward, which comprises best practices that are recommended by research communities.…”
Section: Sensorml Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different interpretations for term "profile" exist. An insightful discussion on this topic can be found on the Library of Congress (LOC) website [16], according to which only some SensorML profiles mentioned in the literature should be considered International Standardized Profiles (ISP) (see also [17]), that is, "An Internationally agreed to, harmonized document which identifies a standard or group of standards, together with options and parameters, necessary to accomplish a function or set of functions". Instead, other SensorML profiles could better correspond to the weaker notion of profile that the LOC puts forward, which comprises best practices that are recommended by research communities.…”
Section: Sensorml Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%