1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004200050241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International round robin tests on the measurement of carbon in diesel exhaust particulates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision of the results is primary linked to the sample heterogeneity and has been estimated to be in the range of 10%. This method gave comparable results as with various thermo-optical methods for a diesel soot intercomparison (Guillemin et al, 1997) and was in the range of ±1σ for BC and TC for the first stage round robin test for carbon aerosol (e.g. urban aerosols, Schmid et al, 2001).…”
Section: Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The precision of the results is primary linked to the sample heterogeneity and has been estimated to be in the range of 10%. This method gave comparable results as with various thermo-optical methods for a diesel soot intercomparison (Guillemin et al, 1997) and was in the range of ±1σ for BC and TC for the first stage round robin test for carbon aerosol (e.g. urban aerosols, Schmid et al, 2001).…”
Section: Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In one study conducted in 1986 (Countess, 1990), the variation between laboratories measuring BC/OC ratios was 10 to 67%. An intercomparison of thermal techniques among European laboratories reported variations of 8 to 44% (Guillemin et al, 1997). Both studies report improved agreement as sample size increased, with reliably reaching 10% for the largest samples analyzed.…”
Section: Srm 1649a Results Dichromate Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Typically, the EC a measurements are highly correlated between methods, but the slopes differ strongly from unity, indicating that the differences are of a systematic nature. While the various thermal-optical and EGA techniques usually agree reasonably well (better than a factor of two discrepancy) for laboratory soot, gasoline and diesel engine emissions, and urban particulates (Countess, 1990;Guillemin et al, 1997;Lim et al, 2003), huge differences (up to factors of six, and occasionally even more) are seen for samples from non-urban areas and biomass burning emissions (Chow et al, 2001;Schmid et al, 2001). But even for the new standard reference materials, RM 8785 (Air Particulate Matter on Filter Media), two different thermal-optical protocols (IMPROVE and STN-NIOSH) yielded unreconciled differences of a factor of 2 (Klouda et al, 2005), so that the material has been issued with two different so-called "information concentration values" (based on the two different protocols) for EC a !…”
Section: Thermochemical Analysis ("Ec")mentioning
confidence: 88%