2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International recommendations for training future toxicologic pathologists participating in regulatory-type, nonclinical toxicity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009 the STP Town Hall meeting was devoted to a debate on the desirability of an international mechanism for recognizing qualified toxicologic pathologists 3 . The majority of participants were against the IFSTP proposal but favored the concept of global recognition based on credential review and a "best practices" approach dealing with educational and work experience and rigorous peer review for entry-level proficiency in toxicologic pathology 4,5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009 the STP Town Hall meeting was devoted to a debate on the desirability of an international mechanism for recognizing qualified toxicologic pathologists 3 . The majority of participants were against the IFSTP proposal but favored the concept of global recognition based on credential review and a "best practices" approach dealing with educational and work experience and rigorous peer review for entry-level proficiency in toxicologic pathology 4,5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most toxicologic pathologists in Europe, Japan, and North America are veterinarians who have completed specialized postgraduate applied and/or research training in pathology and have achieved postgraduate certification in pathology and/or toxicology. 3,14 Similar training and credentials in pathology, but not necessarily toxicology, are required for most veterinary pathology faculty positions in these regions as well. Fewer toxicologic pathologists in Europe, Japan, and North America have specialized training in medicine (MD or equivalent) or comparative pathology (doctoral level), and their numbers have been declining slowly over time.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Toxicologic Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,45 As such, the discipline of toxicologic pathology requires knowledge of morphologic and clinical pathology, pathophysiology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology, as well as other related disciplines, so that complex data can be integrated to provide predictions about potential biological consequences in other animals and humans. 3,17 The educational background of toxicologic pathologists varies considerably around the globe. Most toxicologic pathologists in Europe, Japan, and North America are veterinarians who have completed specialized postgraduate applied and/or research training in pathology and have achieved postgraduate certification in pathology and/or toxicology.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Toxicologic Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is important if the speciality of OMFP is to grow and develop. A number of trans-national curricula/recommendations for pathology training, in various sub-specialities, at national and international level, exist (for example, Bolon et al 2011 (1)). Much of the impetus for this has come from globalisation and freedom of movement for employment, for example within the European Union, with a need to establish training equivalence and standardization of expertise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%