International pathway player perceptions of face validity and fidelity in 360-video and virtual reality cricket

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) and 360-degree video can provide new opportunities for testing and training in sport. Both options offer different benefits in terms of efficacy for training, ease of use, and cost. This leaves questions about the implementation of such technologies and research is required to further understand their use. We aimed to gain initial evidence of athletes’ perceptions of face validity and fidelity in VR and 360-video. 39 international pathway cricketers experienced five overs in VR cricket and in a 360-video recording. After trying each technology, players completed questionnaires to measure perceptions of presence and task workload. Participants reported immersive experience in both methods, but higher levels of realism, possibility to act, physical effort, temporal constraints, and task control in VR. With 360-video offering better possibility to visually examine the environment. VR offers enhanced realism and physical elements but 360-video may still offer solutions for visual tasks.