International Organizations and Global Labor Standards

Abstract

This chapter compares how three International and two regional Organizations, namely the ILO, the WTO, and the World Bank, as well as ASEAN and Mercosur, approach the global governance of labor standards. Defining ‘labor standards’ is notoriously difficult. We therefore use Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining (FACB) rights as a benchmark to assess the positions taken by the five regional organizations. We argue that two main discourses have been pursued in the global debate, a ‘social’ discourse, and a ‘neoliberal’ discourse. We find that organizations whose intrinsic features allow for an institutionalized representation of workers’ interests pursue variations of the social discourse, whereas a neoliberal position predominates in organizations where this representation is lacking. This is true both at the international and regional level. Moreover, we show that the coexistence of these two conflicting discourses has led to contestation, but also to exchange and cooperation. We furthermore outline to what extent the two discourses have changed over time. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of future challenges for the global governance of labor standards.

Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: Findings and challenges

“…Second, although a number of factors were identified in the second section (the subsection on the effects of welfare chauvinism on the design of the welfare state), future research should examine the causal link between micro, meso and macro ‘welfare chauvinism’ from individual attitudes to party strategies and policy reform outcomes (see also Emmenegger and Klemmensen, 2013). By building upon systematic and detailed longitudinal data on party positions on immigration such as those provided by projects like the Immigration in Party Manifestos dataset (Dancygier and Margalit, 2020), or using data on immigrants’ rights in legislation as provided by datasets such as the Immigrants' Social Rights Index (Koning, 2019b), MIPEX (Solano and Huddleston, 2020) or the Migrant Social Protection Index (MigSP) (Römer et al, 2021), new avenues of research in this direction can be embarked upon.…”

The need for guaranteed social and labour compliance clauses in public contracts: An approach to the Spanish case

“…As noted by Semple (2017), through European directives, there are numerous possibilities for contracting authorities to take into account considerations related to compliance with labour legislation, commercial conditions and social inclusion. But at the same time, the EU has expanded its international commitments in the field of public procurement, although working conditions and labour standards vary widely between countries and sectors (Römer et al, 2021). However, as has been stated, this work addresses the reality of the Spanish case.…”

International Organizations in Education: New Takes on Old Paradigms

“…The ILO directly referred to basic human rights and societal values that needed to be enhanced (Hughes 2005). The CLS "were framed as truly global, a set of rights which does not need national government approval" (Römer et al 2021). Due to this framework, the right to education was emphasized by the ILO and the function of education as a means for individual self-development was stressed.…”