2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Measurement of Disability

Abstract: This series aims to provide a public forum for single treatises and collections of papers on social indicators research that are too long to be published in our journal Social Indicators Research. Like the journal, the book series deals with statistical assessments of the quality of life from a broad perspective. It welcomes research on a wide variety of substantive areas, including health, crime, housing, education, family life, leisure activities, transportation, mobility, economics, work, religion and envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess disability status we used The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning – Enhanced (WG-SS Enhanced) ( The Washington Group on Disability Statistics, 2020 ) which has been extensively used and validated elsewhere ( Altman, 2016 ) (α = .77). This measures impairment across different domains including vision, hearing, upper body strength, self-care, and mobility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess disability status we used The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning – Enhanced (WG-SS Enhanced) ( The Washington Group on Disability Statistics, 2020 ) which has been extensively used and validated elsewhere ( Altman, 2016 ) (α = .77). This measures impairment across different domains including vision, hearing, upper body strength, self-care, and mobility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition and measurement of disability have been discussed in numerous studies, both describing the Polish reality (Antczak et al, 2018;Dehnel & Klimanek, 2016;Gołata & Dehnel, 2021) and focusing on international comparability, particularly the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics or the recommendations of Eurostat (Altman, 2016;Loeb, 2016;Mitra & Yap, 2021;Van Oyen et al, 2018). Statistical data should reflect the diversity of people with disabilities and the various aspects of their lives, such as access to education, employment and health services.…”
Section: Disability Definition and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any such assessment is further complicated by the multiplicity of definitions of disability, regulations used for purposes of administrative registers or social assistance in Poland (Antczak, Grabowska, & Polańska, 2018;Dehnel & Klimanek, 2016). There are also differences between approaches adopted in surveys conducted by international organisations (Altman, 2016;Molden & Tøssebro, 2010;Mont, 2007;UN, 2008b;Van Oyen, Bogaert, Yokota, & Berger, 2018). Depending on the survey type, the definition and criteria used in identifying people with disabilities, the population of disabled persons in Poland could range from 4.9 to 7.7 million.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%