2014
DOI: 10.4337/9781781006795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As is the case with research into whistleblowing in other institutions, there has been a major focus on organisational and managerial aspects, leadership and ethics, group relations, and employee differences within the police -often from a quantitative approach through various surveys (for reviews on whistleblowing, see Brown et al 2014;Lewis and Vandekerckhove 2011). Many studies have focused on the willingness to report wrongdoings within the police, and some have tried to predict who will blow the whistle by focusing on general so-called whistleblowing personality traits (Park and Blenkinsopp 2009;Baldwin 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Whistleblowing and The Policementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is the case with research into whistleblowing in other institutions, there has been a major focus on organisational and managerial aspects, leadership and ethics, group relations, and employee differences within the police -often from a quantitative approach through various surveys (for reviews on whistleblowing, see Brown et al 2014;Lewis and Vandekerckhove 2011). Many studies have focused on the willingness to report wrongdoings within the police, and some have tried to predict who will blow the whistle by focusing on general so-called whistleblowing personality traits (Park and Blenkinsopp 2009;Baldwin 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Whistleblowing and The Policementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al . (: 75) refer to non‐organisational whistle‐blowers as bell‐ringers rather than whistle‐blowers. The difference in terminology may not be of concern, but it is important to recognise that organisational and non‐organisational whistle‐blowers can have different motives, encounter different reactions, processes and outcomes, and thus have different whistle‐blowing experiences.…”
Section: Whistle‐blowing Definitions and Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted, the field is largely untrodden in Canada. Interested researchers can gain an excellent overview of the extant literature and possibilities by referring to the International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research (). While we may be behind other jurisdictions, research here can meaningfully contribute to international understandings of this complex, nuanced, and multidisciplinary topic.…”
Section: A Look Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%