International guidelines and recommendations for surgery during Covid-19 pandemic: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical departments were forced to re-schedule their activity giving priority to urgent procedures and non-deferrable oncological cases. There is a lack of evidence-based literature providing clinical and organizational guidelines for the management of a general surgery department. Aim of our study was to review the available recommendations published by general Surgery Societies and Health Institutions and evaluate the underlying Literature. Materials and methods: A review of the English Literature was conducted according to the AMSTAR and to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: After eligibility assessment, a total of 22 papers and statements were analyzed. Surgical societies have established criteria for triage and prioritization in order to identify procedures that can be postponed after the pandemic and those that should not. Prioritization among oncologic cases represents a difficult task: clinicians have to balance a possible delay in cancer diagnosis or treatment against the risk for a potential COVID-19 exposure. There is broad agreement among guidelines that indication to proceed with surgery should be discussed in virtual Tumor Boards taking into consideration alternative therapeutic approaches. Several guidelines deal with the role of laparoscopic surgery during the pandemic: a tailored approach is currently suggested, with a case-by-case evaluation provided that appropriate personal protective equipment is available in order to minimize the potential risk of transmission. Finally, there is a considerable agreement in the published Literature concerning the management of the personnel during the peri-and intraoperative phase and on the technical advices regarding the induction, operative and recover maneuvers in COVID-19 cases. Conclusions: During COVID-19 pandemic, it is of paramount importance to face the emergency in the most effective and efficient manner, retrieving resources from non-essential settings and, at the same time, providing care to high priority non-COVID-19 related diseases.

Management of appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic; short-term outcomes

“…A conservative approach was adopted in managing an acute surgical condition recognising the risk of increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 infected patients. 6 All necessary precautions were taken during this period to avoid exposure to the virus. Steps were also taken to avoid patients coming to the hospital.…”

The impact of COVID-19 on gastric cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

“…Compared with open surgery, there are concerns that the leaked CO 2 and smoke may lead to the generation of COVID-19 contaminated aerosols, which may be due to the application of ultrasonic surgical instruments, low gas motility of pneumoperitoneum, and gas expulsion through trocars or ports [17]. Therefore, The Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19 and The Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) initially highlighted the risk of aerosolization during laparoscopic surgery, although their updated guidance acknowledged a lack of evidence [18,19].…”

Compliance and perception about personal protective equipment among health care workers involved in the surgery of COVID‐19 negative cancer patients during the pandemic

“…The selection of surgeries that should be performed during this pandemic was based on recommendations from various international guidelines. 5 Cancer surgery being categorized as semiemergency had to continue.…”