2020
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Framework for Red Flags for Potential Serious Spinal Pathologies

Abstract: about their care, even when faced with a serious diagnosis. Shared decision making is essential to ensure that individuals are supported to make decisions that are right for them. Using a collaborative process, the clinician should highlight the treatment options, evidence, risks, and benefits and, together with the person, seek to understand how these fit with that person's circumstances, goals, values, and beliefs. 56

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
132
1
13

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
132
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…(Jones et al, 2019) A recently published Red Flag International Framework provides more detail about the relationship of a number of Red Flags to specific serious spinal conditions. It gives clear guidance on timely management and supports the safety netting approach (Finucane et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Jones et al, 2019) A recently published Red Flag International Framework provides more detail about the relationship of a number of Red Flags to specific serious spinal conditions. It gives clear guidance on timely management and supports the safety netting approach (Finucane et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…� People with cancer and currently having active treatment. � BMI of 40 or over (Public Health England, 2020. Finucane et al, 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those signs, within musculoskeletal context are defined as Red Flags (RF) (e.g. clinical indicators of possible serious pathologies ) [40,41] and, notwithstanding RFs as selfcontained screening tools seem to be weak during the physical examination of the patients with some MSK diseases [52], the combination of multiple RFs for the screening for referral process is promising [55,56]. Furthermore, clinical decision making in patients with MSK pain conditions can be supported using validated tools [42][43][44][45], in order to perform or not a review-of-systems [5,23] and for medical referral [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, screening of personal and family medical history, assessment of the risk factors (e.g. smoking, body mass index, congenital or hereditary diseases), screening for RFs [55], watchful waiting [52], and linking RFs symptomology directly with health status and vital parameters, are mandatory professional skills for PT in direct access clinical settings [5,9,23], as it has been clearly stated from a widespread clinical practice guideline [58]. From the patient perspective, the physical examination conducted by the PT demonstrated the professional skills needed to decision-making process for differential diagnosis and medical referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 Importantly, clinicians are encouraged to evaluate the presence of differential diagnoses and serious pathologies (red flags) masquerading as entrapment neuropathies (Table 1 ). 56 …”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%