2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International evidence on bond risk premia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent withDahlquist and Hasseltoft (2011) andSekkel (2011) who show the evidence on bond return predictability across multiple countries. It is worth noting that the magnitudes of the R 2 s are sensitive to the chosen sample.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are consistent withDahlquist and Hasseltoft (2011) andSekkel (2011) who show the evidence on bond return predictability across multiple countries. It is worth noting that the magnitudes of the R 2 s are sensitive to the chosen sample.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The impact that occurs right after the CP factor shock is statistically significant and lasts up to fourteen months. Similar to Sekkel (2011) and Cochrane and Piazzesi (2005), this finding shows that a linear combination of forward rates has an essential role in explaining the risk premiums.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This important issue has been the focus of an extensive literature on asset prices dating back more than a century. Despite an enormous amount of past efforts, whether future asset price changes can be meaningfully predicted is still a subject of ongoing debates and intensive empirical research (see, for example, Ang and Bekaert, 2007;Campbell and Thompson, 2008;Welch and Goyal, 2008;Rapach et al, 2010;Sekkel, 2011). 1 The literature of asset return predictability has focused on the stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%