2008
DOI: 10.2172/937333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test and Diagnostic Method (IEA BESTEST): In-Depth Diagnostic Cases for Ground Coupled Heat Transfer Related to Slab-on-Grade Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [8] in the middle of 90's. Combination of empirical validation, analytical verification and comparative analysis techniques are main proceedings of this methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al. [8] in the middle of 90's. Combination of empirical validation, analytical verification and comparative analysis techniques are main proceedings of this methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, first of all it is important to validate thermal simulation programs [7]. Judkoff and Neymark developed a methodology for such intention in the middle of 90s [8]. Their approach is based on the analytical solution for steady-state heat flow through the floor slab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, (Henninger and Witte, 2015d) carried out studies by means of comparisons with other simulation programs and with analytical procedures. EnergyPlus, with reference to the test-cases established by a specific IEA BESTEST (Neymark and Judkoff, 2008a), shows differences in the range 1.8÷21.8%.…”
Section: Error Analysis Of the Study Methods (Experimental And/or Numementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of one-dimensionality is particularly grievous when it comes to ground-coupled surfaces. Follow-on exercises to supplement the BESTEST efforts 9 have shown that building energy simulation tools still do a poor job at predicting ground heat transfer unless they are coupled to computationally expensive fully 3D numerical models.…”
Section: The State Of Building Energy Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%