Population analysis was performed for 42 Escherichia coli isolates to determine whether heterogeneity of resistance was a factor in piperacillin-tazobactam category differences between agar dilution and broth microdilution. Of 20 isolates discordant between methods, 80% were heterogeneous. Of 22 isolates in agreement, 59% were homogeneous. Heterogeneity and homogeneity rates for those in agreement were significantly different from those that were discordant (P value, 0.010). Heterogeneity of resistance expression appears to be an important factor in category differences observed between broth microdilution and agar dilution for piperacillin-tazobactam.
Interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests can be subjective, even for established reference methods. Various in vitro methods to assess susceptibility have been developed, and conditions can vary widely during measurements. This diversity can cause differences in the metabolic status of bacterial cells and thus their reactivity to antibiotics, implying that results from different methods can vary per strain, as was recently seen in a multicenter study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). Methodological differences can lead to very major errors (VMEs) (reference method resistant and comparator susceptible), which may lead to treatment failure. Major errors (MEs) (reference method susceptible and comparator resistant) can also occur and, although less serious therapeutically, can lead to disqualification of otherwise useful antimicrobials. The frequency of VMEs and MEs depends on the methods used and organism/antimicrobial combinations. However, certain drugs (especially combinations) are often problematic. Root causes for such differences are usually unknown, but clear differences between piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) broth microdilution (BMD) and agar dilution (AD) results were observed for isolates of several species (2-5). Although differences between BMD and AD have been observed for other species, the population analysis discussed here was limited to Escherichia coli. We recently demonstrated that this aberrant phenotype can be clonal in E. coli (5). In this study, isolates were tested by population analysis (PA) in order to determine whether heterogeneity of resistance expression was a factor in the category differences observed between BMD and AD for TZP.A subset of 42 E. coli isolates was selected from a larger set of Enterobacteriaceae obtained for the purpose of studying TZP susceptibility (5). The isolates were obtained globally from as many geographically diverse locations as possible. Isolates in agreement as well as those in disagreement between BMD and AD were included. Strain characteristics are included in Table 1. BMD and AD TZP susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI guidelines (6) and was done in triplicate. MICs were determined by examining the growth for each of the three replicates for each isolate and method. The lowest concentration that completely inhibited visible growth as detected by the unaided eye was recorded as t...