Abstract:Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. While radiotherapy has historically served as a palliative modality in metastatic NSCLC, considerable advances in its technology and the continuous development of cutting-edge therapeutic agents, such as targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are increasing its role in the multi-disciplinary management of the disease.Methods: International radioth… Show more
“…There are two types of lung cancer: non-small cell lung cancer (metastatic NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. 58 Lung cancer has higher morbidity and mortality than most cancers. 59 SLC solely responsible for 10-15% of all lung cancers and yes, the prognosis is very poor.…”
Present review article describes use of radiation and radionuclides on cancer and cancer cell therapeutics. It also sketches out cumulative effects of radiation exposure received by the patients during cancer diagnostics. Though, in cancer therapeutics a selected and permissible dose is provided in several cycles to ablate the neoplastic cells and improve the condition of patient, but radiation harms surrounding cells and imparts negative effects on biology of cells. Ionizing radiation (IR) promotes cancer cell death through cytotoxicity. This article emphasizes both remedial effects and biological effects of radiation and radio-resistance in cells. It suggests safe use of radionucleides by encapsulating them in nanomaterials so as to use it alternate to chemotherapy to destroy various cancer types to enhance the survival of normal cells. This article explains effect of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation on cellular metabolism and genetics.
“…There are two types of lung cancer: non-small cell lung cancer (metastatic NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. 58 Lung cancer has higher morbidity and mortality than most cancers. 59 SLC solely responsible for 10-15% of all lung cancers and yes, the prognosis is very poor.…”
Present review article describes use of radiation and radionuclides on cancer and cancer cell therapeutics. It also sketches out cumulative effects of radiation exposure received by the patients during cancer diagnostics. Though, in cancer therapeutics a selected and permissible dose is provided in several cycles to ablate the neoplastic cells and improve the condition of patient, but radiation harms surrounding cells and imparts negative effects on biology of cells. Ionizing radiation (IR) promotes cancer cell death through cytotoxicity. This article emphasizes both remedial effects and biological effects of radiation and radio-resistance in cells. It suggests safe use of radionucleides by encapsulating them in nanomaterials so as to use it alternate to chemotherapy to destroy various cancer types to enhance the survival of normal cells. This article explains effect of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation on cellular metabolism and genetics.
“…A meta‐analysis found that addition of radiotherapy to the primary tumor could significantly improve the OS and PFS of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC 10 . In another study, radiotherapy for thoracic diseases resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of death by 56% and in the risk of disease progression by 58%, respectively 11 . Hence, the addition of radiotherapy directed at the primary tumor could confer survival benefits in a selected group of patients with mNSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there has been no evidence from randomized clinical trials supporting which timing is better for survival when integrating TRT into the comprehensive treatment of mNSCLC 11 . A previous retrospective study has indicated that EGFR‐TKI plus earlier TRT (receiving radiotherapy before EGFR‐TKI resistance) achieved better PFS compared with delayed TRT (receiving radiotherapy after progressive disease) in stage IV EGFR ‐mutant NSCLC patients and a lower incidence of radiation pneumonitis 12 .…”
BackgroundThe optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in driver‐gene‐negative metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients was retrospectively investigated based on survival and safety profile.MethodsThe efficacy and safety data of driver‐gene‐negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance after first‐line therapy was collected. Patients whose primary tumor and metastatic lesions remained no progression during maintenance and then received TRT were categorized as the NP (no progression) group, while patients who experienced slow progression during maintenance without reaching progressive disease and then received TRT were categorized as the SP (slow progression) group. The efficacy and adverse events of TRT were analyzed.ResultsIn total, 149 driver‐gene‐negative mNSCLC patients treated with TRT during maintenance were enrolled into the study, with 119 in the NP group and 30 in the SP group. After a median follow‐up of 30.83 (range: 26.62–35.04) months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) in the NP group was 11.13 versus 9.53 months in the SP group (HR 0.599, p = 0.017). The median overall survival (OS) in the NP group was 32.27 versus 25.57 months in the SP group (HR 0.637, p = 0.088). The median PFS after radiotherapy (rPFS) was 6.33 versus 3.90 months (HR 0.288, p < 0.001). The adverse events were tolerable and manageable in both groups without significant difference (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe addition of TRT during the pre‐emptive no progression phase was associated with a significantly longer PFS than during the delayed slow progression phase and had an acceptable safety profile. Our results might support the earlier initiation of TRT after induction therapy for some patients with driver‐gene‐negative mNSCLC.
“…This was extensively discussed in a recent consensus of international experts on the use of RT in metastatic NSCLC. However, this was agreed that the evidences on the impact of RT on survival come from the trials in which IO was not used (10). Thus still being aware of the impact of IO on survival in metastatic NSCLC, we cannot yet consider these cases as curable.…”
Background and Objective: Role of radiotherapy (RT) in the era of immuno-oncology (IO) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly changing. RT is not only intended for addressing palliation symptoms but also is considered as a potential tool potentializing an immunogenic effect of given drugs.However, the best timing, techniques, doses, volumes, and its use for asymptomatic patients is a subject of research. We performed a review on the role of palliative RT schedules in combination with IO for advanced NSCLC. Indications in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, outcomes, toxicity, and possible developments are discussed.Methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and PubMed databases and clinicaltrials.gov using the keywords 'lung cancer' AND "immunotherapy" AND 'radiotherapy' OR "palliative radiotherapy".
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.