2018
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains of 60 Physical Functioning Measurement Instruments Used During the Adult Intensive Care Unit Stay: A Scoping Review

Abstract: Background There has been a recent surge in the creation and adaptation of instruments to measure physical functioning (PF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Selecting the right measurement instrument depends on understanding the core constructs that it measures in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. Purpose The purpose of this study was to map systematically the ICF domains and subdomains included in the PF mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
30
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal consistency of the CPAx-GE was good during the ICU stay and moderate at hospital discharge. The CPAx-GE involves respiratory and muscle functions, movements and mobility [12]. Considering that strength does not imply function, the interrelatedness of these items may change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal consistency of the CPAx-GE was good during the ICU stay and moderate at hospital discharge. The CPAx-GE involves respiratory and muscle functions, movements and mobility [12]. Considering that strength does not imply function, the interrelatedness of these items may change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 items evaluate respiratory function, functional mobility (position changes, sitting, standing, stepping), and grip strength with an ordinal scale from 0 (unable/dependent) to 5 (independent) resulting in a maximum score of 50 (independent) and a minimum score of 0 (completely dependent). The measured constructs of the CPAx are allocated to the domains of body functions and activitiesparticularly muscle functions, movement functions, functions of the respiratory system and mobilityaccording to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) [12]. A recent systematic review confirmed the CPAx as a robust measurement for critically ill patients with excellent measurement properties, although cross-sectional validity, i.e., the validity at different time-points in the course of a disease, has not yet been established [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the most appropriate measure must be made based on the psychometric properties [ 50 ]. In a review, González-Seguel et al [ 51 ] identified sixty physical function measurement instruments under different domains for adult patients admitted to the ICU. Mobility was the most frequent domain to be measured and included 38 instruments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical functioning (PF) is the physical abilities allowing functional independence and those related to movement. 1 Poor PF, including decreased muscle mass, muscle strength, and function, is a frequent problem in critically ill patients, 2–4 since skeletal muscle proteolysis is enhanced due to the catabolism caused by the hypermetabolic state of acute illness, 5 , 6 which is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including infections, difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV), a longer length of stay, increases mortality, higher financial costs, decreased quality of life of survivors. 4 , 7 Rapid muscle loss is independently correlated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%