International Capital Constraints and Stock Market Dynamics

Schornick, Astrid V.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.1623732

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

2016

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 313 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…See, for example, Basak and Croitoru (), Basak and Cuoco (), Chabakauri (), Detemple and Murthy (), Gallmeyer and Hollifield (), Garleanu and Pedersen (), Pavlova and Rigobon (), Schornick (), and Shapiro ().…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Asset Pricing with Dynamic Margin Constraints

Rytchkov¹

2014

The Journal of Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a novel theoretical analysis of how endogenous time‐varying margin requirements affect capital market equilibrium. I find that margin requirements, when there are no other market frictions, reduce the volatility and correlation of returns as well as the risk‐free rate, but increase the market price of risk, the risk premium, and the price of risky assets. Furthermore, margin requirements generate a strong cross‐sectional dispersion of stock return volatilities. The results emphasize that a general equilibrium analysis may reverse the conclusions of a partial equilibrium analysis often employed in the literature.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Asset Pricing with Dynamic Margin Constraints

Rytchkov¹

2014

The Journal of Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 See, for example, Basak and Croitoru (2000), Basak and Cuoco (1998), Chabakauri (2013), Detemple and Murthy (1997), Gallmeyer and Hollifield (2008), Garleanu and Pedersen (2011), Pavlova and Rigobon (2008), Schornick (2009), and Shapiro (2002). Shin, and Zigrand (2011) and Prieto (2011) explore the equilibrium effect of constraints in the form of restrictions on the volatility of portfolio returns.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%