2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10887-014-9107-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International business travel: an engine of innovation?

Abstract: While it is well known that managers prefer in-person meetings for negotiating deals and selling their products, face-to-face communication may be particularly important for the transfer of technology because technology is best explained and demonstrated in person. This paper studies the role of short-term cross-border labor movements for innovation by estimating the recent impact of U.S. business travel to foreign countries on their patenting rates. Business travel is shown to have a significant effect up and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is supported by a series of recent studies documenting the importance of short-term (Andersen and Dalgaard, 2011;Hovhannisyan and Keller, 2015) and long-term (Ortega and Peri, 2014) cross-border flows of people for TFP growth and economic growth. These studies find simultaneously little support for openness to trade as a separate channel of knowledge diffusion, therewith corroborating Frankel and Romer's (1999) suspicion that it is the exchange of ideas trough communication and travel rather than the shipment of goods through which openness generates international productivity spillovers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This notion is supported by a series of recent studies documenting the importance of short-term (Andersen and Dalgaard, 2011;Hovhannisyan and Keller, 2015) and long-term (Ortega and Peri, 2014) cross-border flows of people for TFP growth and economic growth. These studies find simultaneously little support for openness to trade as a separate channel of knowledge diffusion, therewith corroborating Frankel and Romer's (1999) suspicion that it is the exchange of ideas trough communication and travel rather than the shipment of goods through which openness generates international productivity spillovers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The information gained through business travel enhances another form of capital, an organization's knowledge capital. Business travel can boost productivity [4], in part by stimulating the diffusion of new technology [5]. The innovation effect of travel is not restricted to business travel.…”
Section: Jacques Pootmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two broader sub-categories distinguished: mobility related to information or knowledge management (c.f. Bryson 2002;Empson 2002) and that related to research or innovation (Hovhannisyan & Keller, 2011).…”
Section: Existing Typologies Of Business Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business mobility is more than just a question of the socio-cultural and organizational dimensions that surround employee movement; it is intrinsically bound up in material and informational technologies, transport systems and a vast array of infrastructure (Bender & Stephensen 1998;Beaverstock et al 2010). Governments frequently cite business mobility as a key factor in planning and investment decisions around transport infrastructureairports, high speed rail, road networks and mass transit systems (Banister & Bereckman 1999;Hovhannisyan & Keller 2011). Clearly the overall drivers behind the development of these material investments in urban and regional infrastructure are multi-faceted and complex, relating to multiple dimensions to global connectivity beyond the direct needs of globalizing firms and industries.…”
Section: ) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%