2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818313000349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Bureaucrats and the Formation of Intergovernmental Organizations: Institutional Design Discretion Sweetens the Pot

Abstract: Bureaucrats working in international intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) regularly help states design new IGOs. Sometimes international bureaucrats possess only limited discretion in institutional design; at other times, they enjoy broad discretion. In fact, they gain discretion even when they openly oppose state preferences. This contravenes conventional thinking about delegation: discretion should decrease as preference divergence between states and international bureaucrats increases. We develop a princi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the "bureaucratic turn" in IO more generally I have in mind e.g. Johns 2007;Johnson and Urpelainen 2014. contributes to that turn by focusing on the under-explored actor in principal-agent models of IO bureaucracy, the agent. As Hawkins & Jacoby put it, "In spite of the growing sophistication of the principal-agent literature, it still contains a remarkably thin view of agent behavior."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the "bureaucratic turn" in IO more generally I have in mind e.g. Johns 2007;Johnson and Urpelainen 2014. contributes to that turn by focusing on the under-explored actor in principal-agent models of IO bureaucracy, the agent. As Hawkins & Jacoby put it, "In spite of the growing sophistication of the principal-agent literature, it still contains a remarkably thin view of agent behavior."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When drawing on the primary legal texts, we mostly concentrated on the position of the governing body, which excludes the perspective of the secretariats and the role bureaucrats can play in embracing the concept of policy integration. As Johnson and Urpelainen (2014), for example, have shown, bureaucrats can be influential in shaping the institutional design of IGOs and therefore expanding the empirical focus to the secretariats might be instructive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are interested in the IGOs' commitment to EPI in their primary laws, we consider EPI to represent one dimension of the IGOs' design -this point will become more plausible in the next sections when we turn to the coding of the data. The design of IGOs is, inter alia, the outcome of the characteristics of its membership base (see Tallberg et al, 2016), its voting rules (see Blake and Payton, 2015), and the preferences and strategies of bureaucrats working in the IGOs (see Johnson and Urpelainen, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical perspective, the rise of trust funds can be studied within a principal-agent framework. The principals are the member states, acting collectively through the governing board or individually as donors, while the agent represents the multilateral bureaucracy (e.g., Nielson and Tierney 2003;Hawkins, Lake, Nielson, and Tierney 2006;Johnson and Urpelainen 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%