2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10902-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal validation and comparison of predictive models to determine success rate of infertility treatments: a retrospective study of 2485 cycles

Abstract: Infertility is a significant health problem and assisted reproductive technologies to treat infertility. Despite all efforts, the success rate of these methods is still low. Also, each of these methods has side effects and costs. Therefore, accurate prediction of treatment success rate is a clinical challenge. This retrospective study aimed to internally validate and compare various machine learning models for predicting the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) of infertility treatment. For this purpose, data from 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected the RFM regarding its best results among well-known machine learning models for dataset (30).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the RFM regarding its best results among well-known machine learning models for dataset (30).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of covariates related to individual characteristics of the donors of the gametes is crucial to assess the impact of embryo culture medium metabolites in early embryo development. Although ICSI circumvents part of the individual variability, the age and BMI of the donors have been reported to influence the success rate of the ICSI [ 21 , 31 , 32 ], particularly in European cohorts [ 33 , 34 ]; therefore, we have considered these covariates to add another layer of embryo selection. The major contributors for discriminating Good, Lagging, and Bad embryos were pyruvate, alanine, glutamine, and acetate, after correcting for the confounders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, optimization algorithms are also recommended in the future [44][45][46][47]. Various validation methods are suggested in this regard, such as experimental tests, numerical simulations, analytical solutions, or comparative studies [48,49]. Furthermore, it is recommended to use the Bayesian model averaging approach to overcome the model uncertainty [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%