2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal structure of the Paleoarchean Mt Edgar dome, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that there is a pervasive greenstone-up sense of shear along much of the Mt Edgar dome margin. These results are interpreted and discussed in the context of a recently published study on the Mt Edgar dome's internal structures (Roberts & Tikoff, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that there is a pervasive greenstone-up sense of shear along much of the Mt Edgar dome margin. These results are interpreted and discussed in the context of a recently published study on the Mt Edgar dome's internal structures (Roberts & Tikoff, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The Emu Pool Supersuite (3.32–3.29 Ga) is variably deformed, with the northernmost units preserving a magmatic microstructure (Collins, 1989; Roberts & Tikoff, 2021). The Cleland Supersuite (3.28–3.23 Ga) is interpreted as the youngest dome‐related supersuite and preserves a magmatic microstructure overprinted by a weak solid state microstructure (Roberts & Tikoff, 2021). These three supersuites are considered to be “dome‐related” because their crystallization ages predate or are concurrent with the inferred timing of doming between 3.33 and 3.20 Ga (Hickman, 2012; Roberts & Tikoff, 2021).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations