2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1743921311000214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Structure of Stellar Clusters: Geometry of Star Formation

Abstract: Abstract. The study of the internal structure of star clusters provides important clues concerning their formation mechanism and dynamical evolution. There are both observational and numerical evidences indicating that open clusters evolve from an initial clumpy structure, presumably a direct consequence of the formation in a fractal medium, toward a centrally condensed state. This simple picture has, however, several drawbacks. There can be very young clusters exhibiting radial patterns maybe reflecting the e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, recent numerical simulations by Girichidis et al (2012) and Dale et al (2013) find a higher degree of hierarchy for stars formed from turbulent molecular clouds with smaller values of D3 ∼ 1.6. These studies, which apply the Qparameter (Cartwright & Whitworth 2004), find similar fractal dimensions with that inferred from the same method for the Taurus molecular complex (D3 ∼ 1.5), in line with the fractal dimensions of the ISM in this region (see, e.g., Alfaro & Sánchez 2011). While the differences in the derived fractal dimensions may reflect discrepancies in the methods used, the may as well demonstrate the fact that stars have a different spatial distribution to the gas from which they formed, or that the gas is not similarly structured everywhere.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, recent numerical simulations by Girichidis et al (2012) and Dale et al (2013) find a higher degree of hierarchy for stars formed from turbulent molecular clouds with smaller values of D3 ∼ 1.6. These studies, which apply the Qparameter (Cartwright & Whitworth 2004), find similar fractal dimensions with that inferred from the same method for the Taurus molecular complex (D3 ∼ 1.5), in line with the fractal dimensions of the ISM in this region (see, e.g., Alfaro & Sánchez 2011). While the differences in the derived fractal dimensions may reflect discrepancies in the methods used, the may as well demonstrate the fact that stars have a different spatial distribution to the gas from which they formed, or that the gas is not similarly structured everywhere.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, recent numerical simulations by Girichidis et al (2012) and Dale et al (2013) find a higher degree of hierarchy for stars formed from turbulent molecular clouds with smaller values of D3 ∼ 1.6. These studies, which apply the Qparameter (Cartwright & Whitworth 2004), find similar fractal dimensions with that inferred from the same method for the Taurus molecular complex (D3 ∼ 1.5), in line with the fractal dimensions of the ISM in this region (see, e.g., Alfaro & Sánchez 2011).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%